While I have not smoked analogs for over a decade, I still enjoyed cigars in the evenings until I found this vapor as a alternative. Of course I will still defend the right of person to smoke outdoors as it poses far less risk to others than many other things, including car exhaust. The fact some people don't like the smell, or the influence it may have on minors is no reason to infringe on the smokers right to smoke.
Here in Minnesota Ramsey County and others have imposed bans on smoking in public parks. They could not find credible evidence of outdoor second hand smoke being a health threat, so they sited the negative influence adult smoking has on the children who use the parks. Based on that logic, I would imagine eating french fries or picking ones nose will be banned under penalty of law next.
The rights of individuals to decide for themselves what risks they want to take in life are being taken away at a record pace, all in the name of the children and/or the public good. The criteria for banning individual freedoms no longer includes harm to others, which should be the gold standard for banning any personal activity.
My son attends Bemidji State University and they are trying to impose a outdoor smoking ban, which will also include the parking lot where we are paying to "rent" a space. My son, with a little help from Dad, has taken up the cause. The campus is located on the shores of Lake Bemidji and the school provides fire wood for a public area that includes a large brick fire pit. Students enjoy large camp fires most evenings. Included in a group of student’s efforts to fight the outdoor tobacco ban, the anti-tobacco committee was provided with the statistical data regarding the emissions from this fire each evening. Needless to say, they did not know how to respond since the harmful emissions equal many times the emissions from outdoor smokers disseminated across the campus.
As most people here already know, this is not about harm to others anymore.