Here's a review from Dr. Joel Nitzkin

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spazmelda

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 18, 2011
4,809
4,513
Ohio
This was published in R-Street, which is a free market organization publication, so it's not likely to be taken as serious science by those eager to dismiss it. The article and argument is very well done, though. Well organized, review of current research and logical arguments for electronic cigarettes as a valid THR product.

http://www.rstreet.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/RSTREET11.pdf
 

Spazmelda

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 18, 2011
4,809
4,513
Ohio
Here is Nitzkin's biography from the end of the article:

INTRODUCTION TO DR. NITZKIN AND DISCLAIMER
Dr. Joel L. Nitzkin is senior fellow in tobacco policy for the R Street Institute. Dr. Nitzkin is a public health physician, board certified in pre- ventive medicine as his medical specialty. He has been a local health director, a state health director and president of two national public health organizations.

Since the mid-1990s, Dr. Nitzkin has been in the private practice of public health as a health policy consultant. In this capacity, he has taken on a number of research and teaching assignments for federal, state and local public health agencies; assisted with accreditation of a managed care organization; and done substantial expert witness work related to communicable disease control, quality of health care, and tobacco control.

In 2007, while serving as co-chair of the Tobacco Control Task Force of the American Association of Public Health Physicians, Dr. Nitzkin played a lead role in exploring policy options for reducing tobacco- attributable illness, death and property damage in the United States. It was this effort that focused his attention on tobacco harm reduction as a potential life-saving measure and on other problematic aspects of current American tobacco control policy.

The views expressed in this policy study are entirely those of Dr. Nitzkin. They do not reflect position statements formally adopted by AAPHP, R Street or any other organization he is affiliated with. Dr. Nitzkin has never received financial support from any tobacco, e-cigarette or pharmaceutical enterprise. His affiliation with R Street is based on shared concerns about the direction of federal tobacco policy since adoption of the FDA tobacco law. R Street Institute is a Washington-DC based think tank that respects the role of govern- ment in regulating industry to protect health and the environment, but strongly opposes undue governmental interference with market forces. R Street designated tobacco harm reduction as one of their priority issues after FDA attempted to remove e-cigarettes from the market by declaring them to be an unapproved drug-device combina- tion subject to the provisions of the drug law.

Additional bibliographic references dealing with these and other issues are available on request from Dr. Nitzkin at jln@jln-md.com .
 

AgentAnia

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2013
3,739
9,455
Orbiting Sirius B

NorthOfAtlanta

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 27, 2011
1,616
3,582
Canton, GA
Excellent read, he has put together what amounts to an excellent synopsis of what most on here believe and would like to see happen as far as THR goes. I have bookmarked it and saved a copy to use as needed.

After reading it I think this could have been written using resources from ECF and CASAA.org as I almost positive I've read at least the abstract and or complete study from every reference he had. Prue should have to read this paper to see what could be done with the information on ECF/CASAA by someone without preconceived "facts".

:D
 

AgentAnia

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2013
3,739
9,455
Orbiting Sirius B
Thanks for posting! Good find. I really enjoyed reading this one! I don't seem to handle the negative crap too well anymore!

I agree. After a while, the negative crap becomes so repetitious it's tiresome to read, and depressing IMO. I almost wish the ANTZ would come up with a new, original lie (how about: --- no, I was going to invent a brand new negative, but sure as I'm alive, some ANTZ will read it, quote it, and another ANTZ myth is born, so I'll leave it to your imagination...) As it is, they evidently can come up with only new variations on their tired old lies...
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
I agree. After a while, the negative crap becomes so repetitious it's tiresome to read, and depressing IMO. I almost wish the ANTZ would come up with a new, original lie (how about: --- no, I was going to invent a brand new negative, but sure as I'm alive, some ANTZ will read it, quote it, and another ANTZ myth is born, so I'll leave it to your imagination...) As it is, they evidently can come up with only new variations on their tired old lies...

Unfortunately, the ANTZ seem to have unlimited creativity when it comes to new BS. At least Dr. Nitzkin classified e-cigarettes as "nicotine vaporizers," which is fairly accurate. But now bills are being introduced that refer to e-cigarettes as "electronic smoking devices." See the description of the propaganda technique "Transfer" here: Propaganda Techniques
 

Orb Skewer

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 19, 2011
1,230
2,459
Terra firma
This was published in R-Street, which is a free market organization publication, so it's not likely to be taken as serious science by those eager to dismiss it. The article and argument is very well done, though. Well organized, review of current research and logical arguments for electronic cigarettes as a valid THR product.

http://www.rstreet.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/RSTREET11.pdf


More from earlier this year

http://www.aaphp.org/Resources/Documents/Dr Nitzkin's Lecture AAPHPSavingSmokers0608 lecture.pdf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread