I don't quite understand the hostility in this thread. Why? We have long wondered about blood nicotine levels -- not liquid levels of nicotine, but how much passes into our blood stream after inhaling vapor. And no one has an answer. No definitive study can tell us, as they can with cigarettes, snus, nasal snuff, etc. We know those blood nicotine levels for specific usages. With e-smoking, we don't know.
And we have established that here is no EASY test for this. Tests can show cotinine in the blood or urine, proving only that the subject uses nicotine. But they don't accurately tell how much. Many of us want to know that. I can easily find the blood nicotine level for my level of cigarette smoking -- and I'd like to duplicate it with e-smoking.
And, BTW, this:
is ridiculously false on its face. The FDA has absolute power over drugs and drug device products. That's what they say the e-cig is under federal law. A court case is now trying to establish the opposite, but good luck convincing the judge. The FDA doesn't need feelers to enforce federal law within its jurisdiction. And that's how it sees e-smoking.
And we have established that here is no EASY test for this. Tests can show cotinine in the blood or urine, proving only that the subject uses nicotine. But they don't accurately tell how much. Many of us want to know that. I can easily find the blood nicotine level for my level of cigarette smoking -- and I'd like to duplicate it with e-smoking.
And, BTW, this:
Yeah, the FDA has feelers out alright. They have absolutely zero power unless they can prove that vapers are abusing nicotine more than a regular marlboro smoker. This is ridiculous on it's face
is ridiculously false on its face. The FDA has absolute power over drugs and drug device products. That's what they say the e-cig is under federal law. A court case is now trying to establish the opposite, but good luck convincing the judge. The FDA doesn't need feelers to enforce federal law within its jurisdiction. And that's how it sees e-smoking.