"Well researched" would have to go a lot farther than that, including a lot more on the differences between the workers' exposure and vapers' exposure.
Agreed.
Article refers to what we do as "smoking" (several times).
Also the quote from ANTZ researcher saying, "not a problem if you’re eating it because it doesn’t get into the lungs at all" doesn't line up with the guy who won lawsuit from eating microwave popcorn. I get that he didn't get it from eating it, but is plausible if it is so highly dangerous to inhale that people who eat any food (or drink) with it in there, are exposed to it anytime they smell their food. The case isn't mentioned in the article which shows not very well researched.
Also, the article fails to cite all the cases where vapers have been harmed by inhaling DAP. Oh wait, that's right, there are none.
Besides that, it covers the issue in way that I'd imagine ANTZ would.