That's what I said, you had to be good enough to get a record deal. He was. He did.And he was a small time nobody until he risked his job to put out a song he believed in. After that, he was popular enough to have his own say.
"It's a long way to the top of you wanna rock n roll"- AC/DC
Well connected gangsters as managers tend to make sure you get paid. If the executives at your label fear death and dismemberment, they won't screw you.
Before Zepplin, it was 12 artists on one stage getting paid pennies.
Afterwards it was stadium shows and wretched excess.
Now, 95% of the money they make goes to the label and their manager, not the artist.
Now there is no money. There are no record sales. There is only touring and iTunes left.
Wrong.When artists pack a venue with 100,000 people, at $100 a pop, they don't make squat. The label makes bank, not the performer.
Labels invested money to make records. Records (CDs to you young-uns) have a HUGE markup and profit margin. Shows were nothing but promotional tools.
Today there are no record sales.
The artists make the bulk of their income from touring.
There is no other real money to be made.
It has nothing to do with the Internet, but everything to do with greedy people running the show. Shut down big labels and start over with the talent making the money and you would see them swimming in cash again. Simple as that.
What money?
There is no more real money.
Slave yourself doing shows until you drop sounds like going backwards to
A working musician.
Labels spent gazillions supporting promoting and distributing, and after all those expenses were paid the rest was profit.Labels used to not make 95% of the money and artist get scraps. They were pretty even. Now all that matters is keeping the investors happy and bending the artists over.
Now artists must pay
For all that up front to record, promote, distribute and market their work all out of pocket.
I guess it's okay if you
Have money. Overall it hurts the industry and it's starting to show.