I Just Couldn't Resist OT, kind of....

Status
Not open for further replies.

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,285
7,707
Green Lane, Pa
Ontario school bans soy spread because it looks too much like peanut butter | News | National Post

In a recent memo, Thames Valley District school board director Bill Tucker wrote that “any products considered to be a peanut butter replacement are no more appropriate in our schools than regular peanut butter.”

Parents were asked to “avoid using peanut butter and peanut butter alternatives because of the difficulty in being able to distinguish alternatives from the real thing.”

Does that sound familiar to anyone? When does the legislation begin banning peanuts, peanut butter and its replacements from parks, beaches and within 25 feet of playgrounds as well as on airlines?
 

RandaPandaBear

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2011
955
368
42
Cleveland Ohio
Last edited:

SharonCC

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 14, 2011
295
76
70
Newfoundland, Canada
I used to be a teacher, and there are an increasing number of children with very severe allergies. A lot of those are allergies to nuts. I had one child who was severely allergic. If he came into contact with peanut butter, the reaction was so severe that he wouldn't make it to the hospital, which was 10 minutes away, unless an Epipen was used immediately. School staff get very nervous, with the possibility of the death of a child, and I expect it's easier to have the restrictions. Soy spread looks like peanut butter? so maybe not allowing it will save the staff from having to check everyone's sandwich...
 

tommy2bad

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 1, 2011
461
506
Kilkenny
I used to be a teacher, and there are an increasing number of children with very severe allergies
Any idea why allergies are becoming so common? Is it because we can keep alive kids who would have gone to their reward in times gone by? Or is exposure to so many different things causing it?
Still it just bull.... banning everything. Easier but wrong.
 

RandaPandaBear

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2011
955
368
42
Cleveland Ohio
Any idea why allergies are becoming so common? Is it because we can keep alive kids who would have gone to their reward in times gone by? Or is exposure to so many different things causing it?
Still it just bull.... banning everything. Easier but wrong.

My theory is processing and pesticide-ing. Perhaps allergies are really to THOSE things.
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
That is just nuts (pun intended.)

The purpose of soy spread is to be a safe substitute. Isn't it most likely that a kid bringing it to school is one WITH the allergy??

What's next? Banning fish and dairy from schools, too, to protect THOSE kids? We are denying 95% of the kids a nutritious food to "protect" the other 5% who have an allergy - and only 1/2% - 1% who have a life-threatening allergy.

Of the roughly 3.3 million Americans who have nut allergies, about 150 die from allergy-related causes each year, notes Christakis. Compare those figures with the 100 people who are killed yearly by lightning, the 45,000 who die in car crashes and the 1,300 who are killed in gun accidents. As a society, Christakis says, our priorities have become seriously skewed, and it's largely a result of fear. "My interest is in understanding [the reaction to nut allergies] as a spread of anxiety," he says.

No one would disagree that children who suffer from life-threatening allergies need to be protected, but the growing trend of demonizing nuts only fuels anxiety, Christakis says. Instilling in the general public the idea that nuts are a "clear and present danger" does little beyond heightening panic. "There are kids with severe allergies, and they need to be taken seriously," he says, "but the problem with a disproportionate response is that it feeds the epidemic."
There's even some evidence to suggest that establishing nut-free zones or nut-free schools may be detrimental to children's health, and increases their risk of developing nut allergies.

Read more: Have Americans Gone Nuts Over Nut Allergies? - TIME
 

Vap0rJay

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 22, 2011
358
224
Maryland
That is just nuts (pun intended.)

The purpose of soy spread is to be a safe substitute. Isn't it most likely that a kid bringing it to school is one WITH the allergy??

What's next? Banning fish and dairy from schools, too, to protect THOSE kids? We are denying 95% of the kids a nutritious food to "protect" the other 5% who have an allergy - and only 1/2% - 1% who have a life-threatening allergy.

Agreed. If your child has an allergy, that is on YOU as a parent. In the card game of life we are each dealt a hand and that is his/her hand dealt and his/her burden to shoulder. I mean, does everyone in OT have to roll around in a wheelchair just because 1 kid happens to be in a wheelchair too? So just because 1 kid is hard of hearing, the entire class can't speak and is going 100% sign-language? How about a ban on cotton because 1 kid is allergic to cotton?

Parental responsibility and accountability seems to be no more. Point the finger @ the world because you were dealt a crappy hand. God almighty I'm a firm believer in de-evolution theory --- because intelligence doesn't seem to be procreating and stupidity is rampant in droves everywhere you look and it pisses me off more and more -- DAILY.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread