"Water intoxication, also known as hyper-hydration, water poisoning, or overhydration, is a potentially fatal disturbance in brain functions that results when the normal balance of electrolytes in the body is pushed outside of safe limits by over-consumption of water"
Water is not a mutagenic, and carcinogenic chemical by nature, and comparison to capsaicin is apples to oranges. Silly argument is silly dear.
Yes, your argument is silly. You are attacking a
strawman. I didn't say that water was mutagenic or carcinogenic. I said that it can be toxic when used far out of normal levels, just like capsaicin.
You are the one who came in here with your snippets talking about peer reviewed journals but that sentence the author used cites no studies in relation to the claim. You have also still done nothing to back up the claims besides the bare assertion by the author. Show me a study of capsaicin where there is toxicity
at these levels people are vaping.
@ aprioristic
Without quoting that painfully huge wall of text, a few points:
The book quoted is not a study on capsaicin in riot gas. That is a medical textbook, and I tried my best to find where the studies they listed were NOT peer reviewed, and I have been unable to find anything. That still stands I'm afraid.
The book is talking about different chemicals being used for riot control. For instance where it is talking about capsaicin causing problems with thermoregulation, that is regarding people who get doused with pepper spray and are probably taking the piss from some cops. There's no reason to believe that people are going to more easily get heat stroke from inhaling a small amount of capsaicin. It seems like a minor concern at best to me.
Just because a chemical might have anti-cancer properties, that does not "cancel out" the carcinogenic nature of the chemical. That is faulty logic and silly. As if we could stick Oats into cigarettes and somehow they are "safer" for the anti-cancer properties.
Another strawman. You really ought to stop employing logical fallacies if you want to talk about logic. You haven't proven that capsaicin is a carcinogen
at the levels we're talking about in the first place. Once again there exist studies that say this, none specifically cited by you or your book. There also exist studies criticizing those that have said capsaicin is a carcinogen.
In that great wall of text, you did not disprove the toxicity of capsaicin, nor that it is safe at all for inhalation willingly. Reduced amounts? So how does that justify introducing more carcinogenic agents into a liquid, when the point was to get off cigarettes in the first place? Seems counterproductive and silly just for TH.
The burden of proof is on you to back up your original statements. The book you have does not cite a single source for the claims of being a mutagen or carcinogen, especially
at the levels we're talking about.
Do you realize how little of the flavorings used in ejuice have been tested at all for inhalation safety? It is under 5% of them. Many of the vendors who have gotten listed on the "list of diacetyl free companies" still have diacetyl in them. We don't know that it is harmful
the way it is used here, but it is true. There has been a lot more research done on capsaicin than most of these flavorings.
The justification for e-cigarettes is harm reduction. People want added heat in order to replicate the analog experience rather than going back to analogs. You are doing a disservice to people when you give misleading info. I never said that capsaicin is clearly 100% non-harmful, but you are trying to cause alarm that is unjustified.
What I cited was the limit of what I could according to ECF rules on quoting of copyrighted text. That is a medical textbook not a study of capsaicin in riot gas. Very misleading statement.
The medical textbook is talking about OC being used in riot control. You need to just stop arguing these points if you can't get studies that actually relate to use
at the levels we're talking about with vaping. I already showed why vaping small concentrations of capsaicin is not the same as the amounts in this book.
To reach the LD50 given by your source, a 50kg (110lb) person would need to inject roughly 2/3 a bottle of Diablo Loco.
As you can see (and ty for the link that is soooo much easier to browse than the print book I have) that was from two separate sections, and while it may seem to have been cherry picked it was what was most appropriate to what was being discussed. If you wish to see where I quoted in the print version it begins on pages 501-505. While I appreciate your wanting to debate the issue, please fully read the textbook before repudiating it.
I read enough to see that the author quite clearly cited zero research to back his claim of capsaicin being mutagenic or carcinogenic.
I still see no justification for introducing capsaicin into ejuice unknowingly to customers, and quite obviously regardless of what the toxicity levels may be, capsaicin is toxic to humans by route of inhalation, chronic or acute toxicity is a red herring.
I would disclose that capsaicin is used if I were Nihkil, but I don't have any issue with him not doing so. It would probably just lead to more false alarms like yours. I've seen this so many times on ECF. Someone pulls out an MSDS sheet giving warnings and forgets totally what we're really talking about.
Your talk about capsaicin being toxic is the real red herring here. We're not talking about use
at the levels in research on LD50s. It is nowhere close. Please stop wasting my time when you have zero evidence.
If you are willing to vape it, enjoy this is America I wouldn't deny you that. But do NOT tout it as safe at any levels, it is not. It is bad enough we are fooling around with poisonous nicotine, why should we be adding what is irrefutably known to be an irritant, and toxic at higher levels?
Again, water "is toxic at higher levels". I still advocate drinking water at non-toxic levels. I also never said that it was 100% safe. Capsaicin kills by airway constriction mainly. The amount of irritation we could be getting is so minor that it doesn't seem to be any issue except where people have asthma or obstructive lung disease already. I said to proceed with caution if you have these problems, and even then I haven't seen anything conclusive. It seems like very little concern for more healthy ex-smokers. There are actually studies too of small amounts of capsaicin aiding pulmonary function.