I have an additional thought on the matter. Let's just say that an administrator in that hospital gets a complaint from a patient that someone is smoking in the emergency room. She walks out to see what is going on and see's a vaper blowing clouds of vapor around the room and trying to convince the person next to them that the "smoke" is totally harmless. The vaper feels they are educating the public. The administrator see's nothing but disruption in her emergency room. She bring the matter up at the next board meeting. The board votes to institute a blanket ban on all e-cigs on hospital property because it is the most direct solution to the situation. The board could have instituted a comprehensive study of the health effects of e-cigs and issued a long missive on how little harm it does but how likely do you think that is going to happen? The single vaper who called the question has set back public acceptance of
vaping and done a dis-service to the
vaping community as a whole. The OP specificly asked for opinions and this is mine.