I'm not searching out problems - this one landed in my lap and if anyone believes this type of presentation won't be a problem is fooling themselves
I say let it be a problem. Again, it ain't going to stop because of this thread's discussion (or ones like it), nor is it going to stop because some are concerned or wish to go on a political witch hunt.
The larger issue is about kids vaping (or not). If one is a self identified member of the vaping community (or simply a self identified vaper) and they wish to express that they fully agree with a ban on sales to / use by minors, then IMO, they've already either not thought this through all that well or they've squarely addressed this issue in that you can't later claim ANY type of packaging is being targeted or made to appeal to kids. That doesn't compute.
But the larger point is kids are going to vape pretty much no matter what. Let the anti or concerned fellow vaper explain why that is. Let them try to pin it all on careless vendors or what have you. I welcome that sort of discussion and wish to expose such points for the false rhetoric they are.
This is cutting to the chase on this issue.
The labels are low hanging fruit. I say let it exist indefinitely. If we lived in a shared political reality where there was a reasonable discussion on how to lessen kids from vaping, then perhaps we could use this as a bargaining chip for the larger point. As that is not the case, and as we have so many fellow, so called concerned vapers, who have conceded or are still willing to concede on the far bigger issue, then IMO, let this continue to be the perceived 'problem' that it is.
When in reality, it really isn't remotely close to an actual problem, nor is getting rid of such labeling even close to a viable solution.