Illegal In June Of This Year

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZERO

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2010
512
4
people's republic
IBTL.......
smokin.gif
 

Princessdee

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 23, 2009
2,551
1,984
PA, USA
Last edited:

ChipCurtis

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 4, 2009
293
8
Yeah, "everyone is studying them", FDA, AMA, ALU, BMJ, ACS, and even NBI (Nothing But Initials). E-cigs have been around in the U.S. for over 2 years. They've all had 2+ years to do their studies, instead we hear "oh, we're studying them, we need to do our studies". I call bull. Where were they for the last 2 years? Answer: Hoping that e-cigs will never become popular, so just keep silent and they'll go away. Well, that didn't work, so now it's "oh, please don't use these dangerous devices, we need to do our 10-year studies on them". Right.
 

randyc

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 26, 2009
179
28
65
Florence SC
All I heard last year was e-cigs were going to be illegal by August or Sept. of 2009. It never happened. I got sick of all the paranoia so I quit paying it any attention which is exactly what I'd advise everyone here. If it happens it happens. It damn sure ain't gonna stop ME from vaping and that's a fact.
 

deewal

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 30, 2008
692
3
78
In a house.
There are feedback loops and I'm concerned. Jumped on UK petitions as I could; the whole mess is rather worrisome (makes one think of Faust). Options 1 and 2 seem the only legislatively viable ones and both mean heaps of trouble.

Yes tarheeldan they have worded that very slyly to make us think there is no Option 3. They say Option 3. Do Nothing and allow these Unregulated products containing nicotine that have not been assessed for safety, quality and efficacy to remain on the market.

What they don't say is that these Devices are already Regulated in the UK by Trading Standards and the Poisons Act.
What the MHRA mean is "these Unregulated products containing nicotine that have not been assessed for safety, quality and efficacy" by THEM The MHRA.
UK people where confused as well but now everyone is choosing Option 3 Do Nothing and are asking who gave this Quango the authority to try to Regulate E-Cigs. They are on shaky ground and will be challenged. If Option 2 is used it means that E-cig Retailers and Manufacturers will have a year to get their Products "assessed for safety, quality and efficacy" by June 2010 which will cost a fortune and cannot be done in a Year anyway. Even if one could do it , it would be Licensed as a Medicine. Which it is not.
Only one company is playing ball (or should i say selling out) and voting Option 2 and that is Intellicig whose aim is to make their E-Liquid all no-Nic anyway.(they allege.) Some users think their Liquid is about as effective as no-Nic as it is.
btw. If you wan't to know why the MHRA are doing this download and read this PDF.
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/idcplg?...068577&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased

Nicorette aka Johnson and Johnson aka GlaxoKlineSmith Major Shareholder in Phillip Morris.
Big Pharma Is also Big Tobacco.
 
Last edited:

Slickstick

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
No way! Not in the U.S.A. Everyone is too paranoid.
E-cigs are the future. They will not be banned. Too much good can come from them. Medical bills going away, cancer reduction, improved health, etc, etc... Cigarettes however may be banned. And even if they aren't, people will stop smoking anyway. NOBODY who smokes likes the new fire ......ant paper they are using on cigarettes now. Soon all cigarettes will have it and everyone who smokes with that paper says that cigarettes taste like total poo. More and more people are moving to e-cigs because of this paper alone. The tobacco companies are shooting themselves in the foot with this one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread