I think my analogy was pretty clear, but I'll go back to your original post and point out where your comment about being asked to leave if they break the rules/laws of the place to which they come being fair.
I actually see your point with your OP, and it would be interesting to see what would happen if we did live that way - no boundaries or borders. However, it would be almost impossible to do that with existing countries and territories because they have already been established, and to try to take away those borders now would cause wars. If, back in the beginning of time, humans had started out not making those boundaries, we could proceed from there, but that didn't happen. Good thing or bad thing, we'll never know.
I was using the analogy of the CV forum because it is something that exists now, as does our country. They do have some similiarities as noted in my post. The reason I ask if you have changed your position since your OP is because, you appear to be saying that we, as mere mortals, should not try to claim things as "ours." They basically all belong to God. You seem to be saying that you think that our imaginary "lines" are used only to control and dominate people. However, when I bring up the idea of removing those boundaries (i.e. allow all people to go where they want, regardless of who they are), you come back with:
Which is why I followed up asking if you changed your position since the OP. If everything was open, and people could go where they pleased, they wouldn't be breaking any rules or laws by doing so. There would be total freedom, and humankind would have no restriction on where they lived, or where they posted their thoughts and ideas.