Innokin TC.... Has Arrived.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Max0819

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 25, 2010
127
48
Seattle
I knew I couldn't be the only one that REALLY likes the VTR form factor and size.
I've always thought it looked stupid and a poor design choice to 'hang' the tank or atty on top of a box. The VTR style is my fav box style bar none. In the case of the VTR being extra rugged is nice as well. I mean some of us are men, that do men things, in a manly way, and tiny, light weight, and pretty in pink, is really not what I am all about.

Of course YMMV :headbang:
 
  • Like
Reactions: awsum140

Max0819

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 25, 2010
127
48
Seattle
I have 2 VTRs that I use every day. I have been using one of them for almost 2 years. I just got an XvoStick clone from 3FVape. Like a tiny VTR. Only 40 watts but has TC. Chip is a clone of the evolve DNA40. I am really like it. fasttech just came out with one as well. Says it is not TC but it is.


Hows that XvoStick? Can you be more concise on the fastech clone? (I mean a little closer than one of 32658 items :p)
 

TheotherSteveS

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2015
5,232
6,814
Birmingham, England
By the time Innokin gets TC out we'll be using nuclear powered mods the size of a book of matches. Innokin makes nice products, for sure, but they are so slow to adapt and market new technology.
it can hold a 'we missed the boat' party with the cloudmaker...lol!
 
  • Like
Reactions: awsum140

herb

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Mar 21, 2014
4,850
6,723
Northern NJ native , Coastal NC now.
it can hold a 'we missed the boat' party with the cloudmaker...lol!

Actually Innokin has never been interested in the "clouds" aspect of vaping , they have been against super high power devices from the beginning and have claimed that numerous times .

The are about "safety" and always have been , they are the exact opposite of say Eleaf for instance in that you will never see them just make a mediocre product and flood the market with them for super cheap $$ .

They also differ from Eleaf by standing behind their warranty and not schilling and promoting their own products by deception like Eleaf always has and still does to this day .

They take their time and test their products to death , sure they lose money but they have always been that way .
 

TheotherSteveS

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2015
5,232
6,814
Birmingham, England
Actually Innokin has never been interested in the "clouds" aspect of vaping , they have been against super high power devices from the beginning and have claimed that numerous times .

The are about "safety" and always have been , they are the exact opposite of say Eleaf for instance in that you will never see them just make a mediocre product and flood the market with them for super cheap $$ .

They also differ from Eleaf by standing behind their warranty and not schilling and promoting their own products by deception like Eleaf always has and still does to this day .

They take their time and test their products to death , sure they lose money but they have always been that way .
Cloudmaker whiteout is a DNA200 or SX350J (and their own ares chipset) modular mod, crowd-funded project that has been dragging on for ages. Nothing to do with cloudmaking per se so what's your point?? All I was saying was the innokin disruptor TC has been floating around as a virtual device for what is in the current climate, an age and nothing has transpired yet.

As for your rant against eleaf, I have never had a problem with istick 30, 50, 40TC or the 60TC. You , like many, are jumping on the eleaf-bashing wagon on the basis of a limited number of badly manufactured devices from yesteryear...time to step off the high horse maybe and actually read and understand what I was saying..thanks for the lecture but no thanks...

...by the way, my post was meant to be somewhat ironic/humorous but obviously too subtle for some...
 
  • Like
Reactions: gerrymi

herb

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Mar 21, 2014
4,850
6,723
Northern NJ native , Coastal NC now.
Cloudmaker whiteout is a DNA200 or SX350J (and their own ares chipset) modular mod, crowd-funded project that has been dragging on for ages. Nothing to do with cloudmaking per se so what's your point?? All I was saying was the innokin disruptor TC has been floating around as a virtual device for what is in the current climate, an age and nothing has transpired yet.

As for your rant against eleaf, I have never had a problem with istick 30, 50, 40TC or the 60TC. You , like many, are jumping on the eleaf-bashing wagon on the basis of a limited number of badly manufactured devices from yesteryear...time to step off the high horse maybe and actually read and understand what I was saying..thanks for the lecture but no thanks...

...by the way, my post was meant to be somewhat ironic/humorous but obviously too subtle for some...


Yes, that never works as i took the cloud maker comment as a hit against Innokin and yes i do know very well what the "cloudmaker whiteout" is . Actually my post was more directed to the gentlemen you quoted and not yourself so my apologies.

Now regarding "Eleaf", no chance i will back down on what they have proved to be about . They are a company that has been found to pack forums with paid shills that do nothing but praise their products while talking down their competitors , "Reddit" found they had many many accounts linked to them and was called out just a few months ago .

Eleaf also has refused to provide warranty coverage on all their failed products over the years even when it was proved that their products were faulty and in no way was caused by user error .

The excuses they use most often are " since you were not using an official Eleaf tank " we will not warranty your Eleaf mod because you used a non Eleaf tank " and "unless you bought your Eleaf product directly through us your product will not be warranted" .

How many people buy their Eleaf products directly through Eleaf and not a vendor , not many and they use the "you bought it through a vendor and not us " excuse very often in denying warranty claims .

Now a Vendor may replace your Eleaf product but they will not be reimbursed by Eleaf .

Those are the two most used Eleaf responses to warranty coverage, a real shame .

Phil Busardo said in one of his You Tube reviews after reviewing the Innokin Coolfire 4 that Innokin and Eleaf are on completely opposite sides of the spectrum in regards to quality .

He said Innokin has it in droves while Eleaf has none , that really says something . If you like you Eleaf i'm happy for you but their extremely shady business practices and refusal to warranty their products has made many former customers look elsewhere for those reasons alone .

Eleaf definitely deserves the criticism they get , it's for very good reason.
 
Last edited:

TheotherSteveS

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2015
5,232
6,814
Birmingham, England
Yes, that never works as i took the cloud maker comment as a hit against Innokin and yes i do know very well what the "cloudmaker whiteout" is . Actually my post was more directed to the gentlemen you quoted and not yourself so my apologies.

Now regarding "Eleaf", no chance i will back down on what they have proved to be about . They are a company that has been found to pack forums with paid shills that do nothing but praise their products while talking down their competitors , "Reddit" found they had many many accounts linked to them and was called out just a few months ago .

Eleaf also has refused to provide warranty coverage on all their failed products over the years even when it was proved that their products were faulty and in no way was caused by user error .

The excuses they use most often are " since you were not using an official Eleaf tank " we will not warranty your Eleaf mod because you used a non Eleaf tank " and "unless you bought your Eleaf product directly through us your product will not be warranted" .

How many people buy their Eleaf products directly through Eleaf and not a vendor , not many and they use the "you bought it through a vendor and not us " excuse very often in denying warranty claims .

Now a Vendor may replace your Eleaf product but they will not be reimbursed by Eleaf .

Those are the two most used Eleaf responses to warranty coverage, a real shame .

Phil Busardo said in one of his You Tube reviews after reviewing the Innokin Coolfire 4 that Innokin and Eleaf are on completely opposite sides of the spectrum in regards to quality .

He said Innokin has it in droves while Eleaf has none , that really says something . If you like you Eleaf i'm happy for you but their extremely shady business practices and refusal to warranty their products has made many former customers look elsewhere for those reasons alone .

Eleaf definitely deserves the criticism they get , it's for very good reason.


No problem! Your point about eleaf and warranty is well made and I agree! :)
 

Eric Auer

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 14, 2014
989
1,887
PA
Hey Eric...are you likin' your Cloupor???

I had low expectations, but it turned out to be a good device for low budget needs.

It pretty much does everything it promises to do.

Little rattle here and there, poor battery door design but it can be had for around $30.

I run a Tobeco Orchid with a 28AWG SS430 coil on mine in TI mode.

If it last a year it's a good deal.

Eric
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread