Di
I hear you talking, but I can't figure out what your saying.
Are you trying say that the holes on the new and improved EM LR5s will be too small to use with some juice feeders without actually saying it?
If I'm interpreting it correctly tobarger, she's saying
There's no implied guarantee that any future atomizer sold by EM will accommodate a bottom juice feeding system.
Moreover, it looks like it was just
sheer-coincidence that they once sold LR and regular 510 atomizers having the same hole specification as all the other brands on the market. And unlike the LR and regular 510s, its just a
sheer-coincidence that their current stock of HV-510s, LR-306s, LR-901s, regular 901s, LR-801s and regular 801s have no problems accommodating a bottom feeding system.
I find it interesting that the makers of these juice feeding systems conformed to the standard hole specification produced by
ALL vendors but now shes claiming the LR and regular atomizers were not designed for juice feeders. This response doesnt seem to bode very well for bottom juice feeding systems and any future expectations from EM.
Even though bottom juice feeders have become more popular these days, maybe EM simply views them as a niche market and doesn't wish to cater to their/our needs. So rather than hoping for the best only to get disappointed, you may want to take your business elsewhere; there are plenty of other vendors willing and able to accommodate the needs of bottom juice feeders.