Just GG
- Thread starter imeothanasis
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Stop counting and push imeo for more "more engraving" tubes if you like the idea 
Of course it would'nt be like Otto's but anyway... I would like more engraving in these tubes!
Of course it would'nt be like Otto's but anyway... I would like more engraving in these tubes!
Stop counting and push imeo for more "more engraving" tubes if you like the idea
Of course it would'nt be like Otto's but anyway... I would like more engraving in these tubes!
I'm with you on that 110%.
more engraving is better for me on all GG's Item.
I don't look for, update look, brushed, matt, hi tech, cold, like any so cold modern Item.
there is no need for my GG to look like any other.
the most thing I like in my GG's is the old time look of quality mechanical device,
which is really old time tech,that actually working.
and old time goes better with engraving,for me,and for my chess lol.
not all in the so called modern era is better, and not all that look like once is outdated.
here steliosss,I add a street shout out on that one.
........
You don't get away with a statement like that. Do tell. Why all people in Greece have inside information except me. Do I have to be old like steliosss?
Yes ITShak it will !!!
Imeo said :" ....CT will be able to connect directly to this new solid tube ....."
if the ct can connect the 4 in one or the stealth cap will too
stan gg legoman
Great info thank you guys. Gotta keep checking here for when Vassilis gets them so i don't miss out.
More engraving is nice but I also like the clean minimal look. WINGS!
More engraving is nice but I also like the clean minimal look. WINGS!
Here is your answere tmccooljr :
Imeo: "....They will be ready in about 10 days or sooner I hope ......and they are made from old brass and SS too ......"
stan gg legoman
Now I have to explain to u what the long pin is for (remember I told u Brb I was lying). When ggts was made it was the best thing there is. It was compatible with 4 types of connections. 510 901 801 and 306. Imeo made a pin that moves to reach all posts of all atomizers made in China which were not consistent in post length. Now the way to connect a 901 is the smartest idea in ecig history which is the small re threader piece. Which screws from one side to 510 connector and the other side to 901 but with a hollow center. It is not you usual adapter it is empty inside. So the pin was made long to go through this small adapter and reach the 901 positive.
I hope I didn't anything wrong old timers can correct me. I always admired the technology that imeo made with this idea of connector that is why when he made just gg like a regular connectors i felt bad. It is like Metallica going from master of puppets to load reload era
I hope I didn't anything wrong old timers can correct me. I always admired the technology that imeo made with this idea of connector that is why when he made just gg like a regular connectors i felt bad. It is like Metallica going from master of puppets to load reload era
so better use the 4 in one on telescope regular,
and CT or new stealth cap on the 18650 tube??
as you say becouse this long center post may not fit on the tube only combination ? ?
This is exactly what I am saying. Long ggts pin was made for telescopic. Of course it is used also inside the ct of ggts which works because of The length of the ct and the pin doesn't protrude.
Thx aal,
so the pin of the 4 in 1 will be to long to connect it to the 18650 tube, like if you use the GGTS Connector .
did not yet have one im my hand.
Stan
p.s.: so if we want to have a Full old brass 18650 tube JustGG we all need a stealth cap in old brass ?
p.s.s.: Imeo !!! WE NEED OLD BRASS STEALTH CAP !!!!!!!!
Last edited:
x|0|0
x|x|0
0|0|x
Stanley 4 in one is 510 after all it may fit well on telescop.
but for 18650 new AD in old brass suit us better.
ADD:
don't need to confuse:
the J's without CT's and TS's without CT's are the same!!!
so we take 4 in one for J's with telescop
and we take AD OB when this will be for 18650 tube!!
x|x|0
0|0|x
Stanley 4 in one is 510 after all it may fit well on telescop.
but for 18650 new AD in old brass suit us better.
ADD:
don't need to confuse:
the J's without CT's and TS's without CT's are the same!!!
so we take 4 in one for J's with telescop
and we take AD OB when this will be for 18650 tube!!
Last edited:
Yes guys, the old style 4in1 in beautiful with its rounded edge with no air slots, but it's almost impossible (*) to use with JustGG without using the telescope, so I think it is not going to work on the 18650 tube.
* I say almost impossible, because you may use your dremel to shorten the center pin, this way the inner space is too short anyway for few mm., but you may try to shorten the VC spring, too...
In short, it's a PITA.
So, as the President of Lego GG men sayd: WE ABSOLUTELY NEED AN OLD BRASS STHEALT CAP!
* I say almost impossible, because you may use your dremel to shorten the center pin, this way the inner space is too short anyway for few mm., but you may try to shorten the VC spring, too...
In short, it's a PITA.
So, as the President of Lego GG men sayd: WE ABSOLUTELY NEED AN OLD BRASS STHEALT CAP!
I use the telescope on daily basis with my J's. ( as many others I guess)
lets put it in perspective the J's extra extension for closing all the mod
is not a limitation factor only an added feature,for user choice!
so no need to fix the Idea on mind that the JGG is not telescopic mod after all as it is so.
it's direct evolution of the GG fat mod from TS rev1 to J's with VIR.
lets put it in perspective the J's extra extension for closing all the mod
is not a limitation factor only an added feature,for user choice!
so no need to fix the Idea on mind that the JGG is not telescopic mod after all as it is so.
it's direct evolution of the GG fat mod from TS rev1 to J's with VIR.
- Status
