So I just placed my first order with MVS last night. I finally took the plunge and bought a variable volt APV. I picked up the Lambo. Anyone out there vaping on this bad boy? what are some pluses/minuses about it?
Man, after watching that I feel like I might have made a bad choice.... Oh well we'll see how it works. If nothing else it will let me see if I like VV or not.
I think I have figured out a soultion to my airflow problem. I bought a Vivi Nova and put it on there and the airflow problem is resolved. I really like these tanks too. Anyone else using these nova tanks?
I don't know if anyone is following this or not but I am still going to comment for anyone else who might be looking at the Lambo.
Well today I am having some RVPs, (Real Vaper Problems), the threading on the Lambo is terrible! Well at least on mine it is terrible. I was rocking a Vivi Nova tank and found that the draw went from being to airy to too hard. So I put on a extender... I should also point out that the Nova tank didn't catch any threads until it was about 90% inserted into the device. So, I put on my extender and the same thing. Now I can't get the extender to stay in and the nova is not threading either. I used t have a 510 to 510 connector from MadVapes and that seemed to work well in the past. I think I will pick up another and see if that doesn't fix the problem. The only problem with that is I have to wait a week for some more cash, that and I refuse to pay 3 bucks to ship something that could fit into a envelope for 45 cents!
Long story short, I was able to use my Lambo for about three days before it was sidelined. While it worked it was great. I'm sure if the extension piece works then I will be a happy vaper again. Until then, however, I will be using a Bolt with a 2.5 DCT @ 6V using stacked 16340's.
Hi, can you see if you are able to take of the top cap on the Lambo? (see image below) If so, I will mail you a new cap.
The top cap spins off counter-clockwise
It sounds like you received a unit with defective threads. It was not intended to be that loose.
View attachment 162247