sooo im lost here... are e cigs banned in NY or not?
They are not currently, however there is a pending bill that would make them illegal. Which is what we are all trying to prevent from happening.
sooo im lost here... are e cigs banned in NY or not?
As it says in the beginning of the post: Passed in the assembly unanimously, hasn't come up in the senate yet.I think that the bill hasn't been voted on yet, they seem to have added a ban to adults as well. So far it appears to have unanimous NY legislator approval (all approve, zero oppose). Your governor Patterson is in a very powerful position, I believe, as he alone can veto the whole corruption, to the best of my knowledge.
As it says in the beginning of the post: Passed in the assembly unanimously, hasn't come up in the senate yet.
Unfortunately Patterson is also an idiot with a 20% approval rating and he's a tax ..... (soda, itunes, he put a whole list out of things we wants to tax). The only way he'll be of any assistance is if we tell him to tax instead of ban. The thing that call girl, Ashley Dupree, should feel bad about is not her life choices, but leaving us with Patterson.
..... or not, I really think he needs communication with vapers. The first step is to obatain assurance to veto the bill and allow the advancement of electronic cigarettes. Step two will then come automatically, and real stores will open up in New York who can sell parts and supplies and pay tax. Without stores in NY, we may even see New Yorkers in Virginia buying parts and supplies here, and helping Virginia pay tax.
I dont know if this is the appropriate place to put this but here goes.
Tom Petty is using ecigs to quit smoking
Leonardo DiCaprio currently uses ecigs
I dont have twitter, but both of these celebrities do.
If anyone can twitter to them, it might be a very good idea to do so.
Here are their websites :
L E O N A R D O D I C A P R I O - Official Website
TomPetty.com > Home
Just a thought...but it would definately help if we could get a celebrity to help fight the cause.
I watched the NYS Assembly video again.
You know what? This video scares the hell out of me and it should scare the hell out of any New Yorker.
Unreal!
I haven't seen mention of ASH, (cant put a link cuz I dont have enough posts) this organization who is putting a lot of fuel on the fire. They should keep their eye on tobacco and be for vaping. Of course everyone on this thread that watched the video realizes these people have no idea what their talking about. With all the issues we have going on in the world, their gonna waste their time on this! Is there anyway we can let this ash organization know how positive this has been for all of us and the lively hoods that their threatening?
"He" not "they"Ash has openly taken credit for the New York ban effort... Even though I doubt they had much to do with it from the look of it. They try to take credit for ANYTHING related to E-Cigarettes if its within their own interest.
They likely would have tried to take credit for Illinois had the result of our bill not turned out as favorable on part of E-Cigarette users.
"He" not "they"
Maybe, but I don't want people to get the impression that ASH is any bigger than Banzhaf's ego.I stand corrected.
Doesn't he have a bunch of intern volunteers he abuses to do research for him?![]()
John F. Banzhaf III is leading the charge to sue food companies for their customers’ choices. For Banzhaf and his trial-lawyer allies, “big food” is the next tobacco-style cash cow, ripe for the multi-billion-dollar picking.
Banzhaf has never met a lawsuit he didn’t like. A George Washington University law professor, Banzhaf brags that his signature class is nicknamed “Suing for Credit” (and, by some, “Sue the .......s 101”). That’s clearly Banzhaf’s passion: his vanity license plate reads “SUE BAST.”
Banzhaf was one of the first trial lawyers to propose health-related litigation against tobacco companies. As executive director of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), Banzhaf pays himself over $200,000 per year in salary and benefits. That’s in addition to his professor’s salary. While he claims he “won’t see a dime” from food lawsuits, he said the same about tobacco torts many years ago. ASH sells tobacco “lawsuit kits” for $25 each.
While he’s still collecting hefty checks from ASH, Banzhaf now receives more attention for his frivolous scheme to bleed restaurants dry. First attacking fast-food in July 2002, Banzhaf served as an adviser to a lawsuit filed by New York attorney Samuel Hirsch on behalf of Caesar Barber -- a morbidly obese man whose health suffered because of his poor diet and lack of exercise. Barber’s suit claimed McDonald’s was to blame because he ate too much.
After the Barber suit was laughed out of the court of public opinion, Hirsch and Banzhaf went back to the drawing board for their second multi-billion-dollar fishing expedition. This one used children as the bait. The trial judge dismissed the case, writing: “If a person knows or should know that eating copious orders of super-sized McDonald’s products is unhealthy and may result in weight gain, it is not the place of the law to protect them from their own excesses.”
Banzhaf has lost every obesity-related case he’s been involved in, but that hasn’t stopped him from falsely claiming “victory.” In order to mislead the public into thinking obesity lawsuits are sensible and mainstream, he’s bragged about several so-called “wins” in these cases. One of his self-proclaimed “victories” (over mislabeled ice cream containers in Florida) resulted in customers being offered two free desserts for every one they had purchased. In another case, brought against McDonald’s for not listing beef tallow as a French-fry ingredient, Banzhaf himself admitted that it wasn’t really an obesity suit: “Now, notice,” he told a 2003 food policy conference in Washington, DC, “This is not, first of all, an obesity case. I mean, this wasn't the problem. We couldn't prove that anybody got fat, or that anybody got sick.” His other obesity “victories” are just as flimsy.
Banzhaf threatens so many obesity-related lawsuits against food companies that it can be hard to keep track. In June 2003 he sent letters to six fast-food chains demanding that they display “warning” notices about the allegedly “addictive” nature of fatty foods. He even claimed that fast food “can act on the brain the same way as nicotine or .......” One month later, Banzhaf teamed up with the Center for Science in the Public Interest to warn six ice cream chains that lawsuits could result from their refusal to immediately “list the calorie (and, ideally, saturated fat) content of each item” on their menus and menu boards.
He even threatened to sue the Seattle School Board -- and individual school board members -- for making soft drinks available to teenagers in school. Banzhaf has also discussed going after milk producers because the famous “Got Milk?” ads don’t mention the benefits of skim milk. Just as cream rises to the top, John Banzhaf can always be counted on to sink as low as possible.