Unless we want to let non-ECF members feel welcome in CASAA. There are CASAA members banned from ECF who can't even read these posts. What about them?
I'm not passing judgment on anyone, but I would err on the side of caution. I don't think ECF has been so poorly moderated as to expect a great number of people being banned without good reason and there's no reason to re-invent the wheel.
One of the founding principles of CASAA is integration and diversity, so I completely support expanding the scope of CASAA anywhere we can. However, CASAA was founded here at ECF, and the nominees are running on their ECF handles. It seems unfair to me to expect people who unable to read the posting histories of the candidates to give a fair voice at this juncture.
Everyone should have a voice, and it is my hope that CASAA will be an effective sounding board for
everyone, not just posters here at ECF. To that end, I'm encouraging a bit of restraint to ensure that we remain relevant.
The CASAA forum has nothing to do with bylaws and the constitution anymore than this ECF forum does. It's to serve the exact same function as this forum, but be open to EVERYONE.
Perhaps you misunderstood. There are moderation issues that need to be resolved and the events of last night underscore that point. If CASAAforums.org is going to fairly represent the organization, it behooves us to establish our policies
first.
I appreciate your offer to help - I'll probably take you up on it!
You're gonna get my help, like it or not!
I'll leave it to others to determine my form of participation, but I'm in this for the long haul.