Does MFS use nicselect? It has decent TH, but is there one with better TH? Or do I need to wait for the results to come in?
I'm pretty sure mfs use alchem's nic(nicselect), or else they are abusing alchem's nicselect branding. I'm reffering to the nicselect branding chart that lists nicselect purities compared to usp and ep standards... They stated a long ago that they had stopped using it, after all the "rubber smell/taste" reports, but I think they have reverted back to using it again, now after the products seems more stable...
Oh, crap! I just checked there site again before posting this post, and I can see now that I was wrong about the branding! I sincerely apologize for spreading false information, or atleast I don't know if they use nicselect, but I think not...
I thought that the chart they used was the one from nicselect, since I clearly remember the e.g. 4 green vertical checkmarks, where they lists quality charasteristics, and then all the fields under which compares the purity to usp and ep standards.
However, after comparing the mfs charts closer to the nicselect official chart, then mfs dictates e.g.:
Best flavor
Unmatched purity
dependable quality
batch tested.
Whereas the nicselect uses the same vertical green checkmarks, but with the words:
Highest purity
Consistent quality
Better flavor
FDA inspected.
And then under that, all the values compared to usp/ep, and where there also are slight differences!
Again, I deeply apologize, and I remember posting this false claim in other posts also, so please disregard those older statements from me, please...
