I'm not trying to be "Anti-SLR" or something. It just seems easier to get within a standard ohm range by using more coil wraps and maybe a little thinner wire. You can make it as hot or cool as you like with VV. The more wraps increases the surface area.
This reminds me of the whole dual-coil thing. Cooler but more surface area. I understand that amp limits are a problem this way when you want to push the wattage.
See, you clearly do not understand...
I use 28 gauge wire... thicker than normal
I use 7 wraps... giving me 0.8 ohms
because the wire is thicker it does not get as hot... thinner wire gets hotter...
however, because it is such low resistance wire, i use 7 wraps around 6mm of silica... that's more surface area and more vapor... thinner wire would be up at like 2.0 ohm at that point and simply be ineffective on a 3.7v device... we'd be back to the VV mess of burnt juice.
It's very complicated and hard to explain to someone who hasn't tried it... you should go to a Brick and Mortar and find someone running a setup like i describe... and take a couple test puffs... it is mind boggling.
But...is it much different than what people get with DCC's and VV ?????
It is as different from VV and DCC as cig-a-likes are to Provaris
A four amp device at, say, 6.0 volts is 24 watts and well within the rage of many PVs with regulated circuits. How many watts does it take for SLR? And by that I mean...what is commonly done?
17 Watts is common... that's 0.8 ohms at 3.7 volts.
your 24 watts would fry juice
Last edited: