Not quite sure how to feel about this article

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pelagic

Full Member
Mar 23, 2012
40
22
Canada
It's actually surprisingly good considering it is in the trash tabloid that is The Daily Mail! In comparison to most of their horrible "articles" it is not bad, it even has decent grammar and interesting photos. It's not very accurate and it's deliberately designed to be shocking or start controversy, but that's what The Daily Mail specializes in. I liked the first photo of the guy exhaling vapor out his nose like a dragon. I learned a long time ago not to get upset by the idiocy that is The Daily Mail and as I said I think this is one of their better articles when you look at it in relative terms.
 

The Ocelot

Psychopomp
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 12, 2012
26,497
79,193
The Clock Barrens, Fillory
What are you talking about? There is absolutely nothing odd about my mod.

provocelot.jpg
 

Amish3006

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 13, 2013
246
331
Cincinnati, Ohio
Mrtrucker40108:9528044 said:
So we puff things like 'Thug Juice' and 'Dragons Fart' out of battery holders named Diablo and Caravella while huddling around screens to discuss the best resistance coil to make out of ribbon kanthal..... What's odd about that?

I know right. When I started reading up on vaping I didn't know what to think at first.
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
It was no accident that the reporter centered on those who would "stand-out" in your average suburban mall. I'm glad that anyone, regardless of who they are, was smart enough to stop smoking by turning to vaping. But the writer of the article had a definite "slant" in his article.

Note: the longer, full article provided more depth, which was good. But the writer still slanted the article to the outer edge instead of the middle of the road. He didn't capture the large umbrella that vaping encompasses.
 
Last edited:

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
"The Food and Drug Administration still classifies inhaling the odorless vapor of an e-cigarette to be smoking."

Is that even true? That statement is vague and confusing. I didn't know the FDA got to define the term "smoking"?
As far as I know the FDA does not have any definition of "smoking" per se.

The question is will they lump electronic cigarettes in with the definition of a tobacco product.
Which they are almost sure to do, some day, maybe.

That still will not have anything to do with any definition of "smoking" which as far as I know does not exist at the Federal level.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread