IMHO opinion, no one method is going to help a smoker quit, and no one method at any given TIME is going to help a smoker quit, you have to be ready. In my personal opinion, vaping has helped more "chronic hopeless" smokers quit, the ones that have tried everything, but failed, and feel like nothing will work. I don't begrudge pharmaceutical options (besides maybe Chantix) and I also did NOT quit the first time I encountered vaping. It's not a panacea, but what it does for the (hopeless me) is give me something I can tolerate and enjoy after the initial discomfort, and something that satisfies almost all aspects of the addiction I had.
I quit for 18 months when pregnant and nursing, and I wanted a cigarette as much on day 18 months as I did on day 1. That did not happen with smoking. Even the most determined cold turkey quitter can experience recidivism.
But what makes harm reduction so successful in general (in my opinion) is that it has a trickle down effect. Less smoking parents, friends, and teens experimenting with vape produces-- less smoking peers, experimentation, parents to steal tobacco from, modeling, etc. If vaping is allowed to continue, I kind of see a possible world where no next generation is taking up smoking in a meaningful way, like more than 1% which isn't enough for BT to survive on.
Hence the hysteria and blind taxation and regulation of vaping. Scientists in the pocket of BT or Mother's against vaping and most certainly governments all see this to be true. They're not afraid of vapes harning ANYONE (besides the lemmings following the sheep) they're afraid vaping will cause cigarettes to become redundant.
And yes, the conclusion is BS.
Anna