waiting for the giveaway!!!!
































































Yea my top (510 connection) unscrewsI think there were some big design changes from the aluminum tube P1 to the steel tube ones. The aluminum ones you could take the top cap apart IIRC from what I read. I still regret selling my P1![]()
I'm definitely down for any tootle puffer thing you folks put out. I'm a 7-9 watt vaper and that isn't ever going to change. It's what works for me.Sorry, I can't talk about that one yet, but it's for us tootle puffers.
Our dear friend Ocelot is still working on the prototype drawings.
Yeah, when they made the changeover to the steel tube they press fit the top cap on like they continued to do with the original ProVari...Yea my top (510 connection) unscrews![]()
Do you even need a battery at 9 watts
![]()
Not really. It's the perfect setting for an original Radius Zen Hamster.
I had a vaper friend at work challenge me, when I told him that I vape 1 ohm~ at 10 watts, while discussing his 150 watt, dual battery, Extra-Mighty Bulk-o-Matic box mod.I'm definitely down for any tootle puffer thing you folks put out. I'm a 7-9 watt vaper and that isn't ever going to change. It's what works for me.
I just don't get why someone would tell me to use a mod that goes to higher watts, and modify my build, to get the SAME VAPE EXPERIENCE that I already get on my existing mod and build.
----------------
A PROVAPE SIDE-BY-SIDE!!!
Even if it's just a Provape engineered adapter like this one...
View attachment 543583 View attachment 543584
(Don't you laugh Kat & DP!)
I keep telling myself I dont need the Procyon since I have a P3 already. But it is really tempting. Really tempting. I went to order a Procyon today and it showed the ship time to be 1-2 weeks out. So maybe that it is a sign to wait (or a sign I should have ordered it right away) but will wait and see next week.
Plus I am so happy with my Radius (I bought two) that I am trying to justify the Procyon. Hmmmm... I think I am trying to talk myself out of buying a Procyon. Heh.
Ahh yes, you must be referring to the device we are working on that uses 9 stacked 18650 batteries, goes up to 450 watts, comes with a welding torch and taser attachment. Sorry, I can't talk about that one yet, but it's for us tootle puffers.
Our dear friend Ocelot is still working on the prototype drawings.
Who will buy a P3 now at the same price? I do not understand Provape pricing.
Now? You want this NOW????
I'm sorry, dearest TO, but that particular horse is most definitely glue already.
I had a vaper friend at work challenge me, when I told him that I vape 1 ohm~ at 10 watts, while discussing his 150 watt, dual battery, Extra-Mighty Bulk-o-Matic box mod.
He said, "...Yeah but if you could get that same performance and vape experience from 0.3 ohms at 50 watts, why wouldn't you...?"
I just stared at him for a solid three minutes...blinking.
This is what the wattage race has done to people.
If I get the same vape experience from 0.3@50 as I do from my sweetspot of 1.0@10...WHY WOULD I SWITCH?!?!?!?!?!?
By the way, this has nothing to do with the Procyon.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not against the Procyon. I don't want one, based purely on the size factor...but I am FLOORED that Provape released another new device!
I just don't get why someone would tell me to use a mod that goes to higher watts, and modify my build, to get the SAME VAPE EXPERIENCE that I already get on my existing mod and build.
----------------
On a Procyon related note:
I'm so excited to see new stuff so soon from Provape, because that means the creative juices are still flowing steadily.
This gives me hope that we will see a Provape atomizer (potential Zen~ co-op), a smaller version of the Radius (same stats as the P3, for 18350 size), a 14XXX series mod (19mm?)...but most importantly...
A PROVAPE SIDE-BY-SIDE!!!
Even if it's just a Provape engineered adapter like this one...
View attachment 543583 View attachment 543584
(Don't you laugh Kat & DP!)
Oh you said tootle puffer
I thought you said Turtle Surfer
![]()
I meant it could be emphasized on the packaging of new devices.
I posted this years ago:
![]()