PLEASE WATCH THIS--A cure for cancer!

Status
Not open for further replies.

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,291
7,714
Green Lane, Pa
Dr. Mercola did a review of this movie:
Burzynski the Movie

Has anyone ever contacted Dr. Mercola about his views on eCigarettes?

The one paragraph that really struck me-

"I'm sure that whenever someone donates their hard-earned money or participates in a pink-ribbon walkathon, they believe they're doing a good thing. They believe they're helping fund vital cancer research that will hopefully, some day, find a cure for cancer. Little do they know that much of this money goes toward perpetuating the status quo of cancer treatment, namely highly toxic drugs and expensive machines—the same old paradigm centered around profit."

I've question all my "charitable contributions" since getting involved with our issue.
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,291
7,714
Green Lane, Pa
This is an amazing video! Wow! The injustice of the FDA and federal government astounds me. To look at this, we have had a fairly easy time with e-cigs in comparison. Less money at stake I would guess.
Thank you so much for posting this wonderful link.

Be afraid, be very afraid. Just because we've won a few battles doesn't mean that the FDA and BP have surrendered. I'm feeling that they've just changed strategy. We see it every time a proposed ban get started on local or state levels. They know there are many ways to skin a cat and just because they've apparently lost in the court of law doesn't mean they've given up the battle.
 

Demarko

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 15, 2010
397
78
48
Seattle, WA
www.twinrosesoftware.com
Be afraid, be very afraid. Just because we've won a few battles doesn't mean that the FDA and BP have surrendered. I'm feeling that they've just changed strategy. We see it every time a proposed ban get started on local or state levels. They know there are many ways to skin a cat and just because they've apparently lost in the court of law doesn't mean they've given up the battle.

I think they are trying to weigh their options right now, and are regrouping. More and more they are finding their battles of public opinion going against them because, generally, I find that MOST people aren't anti-smoking. They either don't like cigarette smoke, or they care about a loved one who smokes and has a nasty cough or some other problems caused by smoking. To them, an ecigarette is fine, they don't mind that their loved ones are using them, or that someone sitting at the bar next to them is using one.

So they go in there armed with all this "evidence" against ecigs, and people are by and large, "So? If it doesn't hurt us, and doesn't stink, who cares?" In the case of Pierce County recently, we had a large number of never-smokers standing up and saying, "No, these are fine... Worry about actual health risks!" They are SO used to having public opinion 100% behind them, or at least not opposing them, that they aren't sure how to handle this.

What were the final results of the MSNBC poll? About as liberal a media as you can get and it was like 70% of people said ecigs should be allowed on planes?

Don't get me wrong, I don't think they've considered this war over, and nor should we... but at this point, they need to create a new strategy. The same ol' stuff they've been saying for years, they know, isn't going to work here.
 

MagnusEunson

Bearded Super Villain
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 30, 2011
4,448
4,789
Behind you
I've stated in the OUTSIDE! and elsewhere my distaste for the FDA and protectionism across all industries. Big Pharma is a huge enemy to food supplies, supplements, e-cigs, etc. No question about it. It's not unknown that they interfere and tamper with many life-changing and indeed life-saving options that would otherwise be available to patients.

However, nothing is stopping peer-review of Dr. Burzynski's work. Nothing except Dr. Burzynski himself it would seem. The FDA can't stop that. And it just hasn't happened in any reputable peer-reviewed journal. And those journals frequently buck the FDA and the larger Government. Setting all the other questionable activities and accusations against Dr. Burzynski aside, ~that~ should be one of the most glaring alarms that this work might just not be truly miraculous.

Charlatans frequently use other flaws in the system as evidence to promote themselves.

Now I'm perfectly willing to concede that not only has Dr. Burzynski been the victim of spectacularly unfair treatment by the FDA but that he also has reason to be paranoid about being so controlling over any trials and tests run ~anywhere~ using his techniques. However, if he is ever going to get approvals anywhere in the world he is going to have to let loose at sometime. Lets assume the trials he has ending tentatively in December 2011 are wildly successful. Somebody is going to have to replicate that other than himself. That's simply good science.

There is also some question as to whether he misrepresents the Japanese and Italian optimism in the documentary.

It would be the sincere hope of any human being that there is a miracle cure being withheld here. I'm confident many miracles and solutions are withheld for political grounds. However, ..

Stanislaw Burzynski and "Antineoplastons"

Antineoplaston Therapy

QUACK-QUACK Goes Burzynski - Page 1 - Movies - New York - Village Voice

I hope the Gods have actually smiled on us with a better treatment for Cancer. I'm just not holding my breath. -Magnus
 

Ravenscroft

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 29, 2010
1,489
401
Sydney, Oz
Wow, I just watched the movie and apart from being flabbergasted by the corruption I can now see what we are up against
Your FDA are a horrible organization! I feel helpless at times with such deceit from powerful bodies but that Doctor just gave me hope with his gentle yet strong commitment to keep going amongst the lies and treachery.

RC
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,291
7,714
Green Lane, Pa
Okay, I spent my two hours at the local gin mill yesterday drinking Tanqueray and Tonic watching this documentary, From the moment Dr B came on, I knew I had seen him before and could recall that what I saw was not produced in a favorable light. I kept thinking it was 60 Minutes or that kind of show, a long while ago. I still might be right about that, but I now know where else I saw him- Dateline, earlier this year.

They had Suzanne Somers on, talking about her latest book on alternative medicine. Dr B's work was one of the topics. Two links to Somer's blog-

Suzanne's Blog | Dateline Response - Alternative Cancer Treatments - Beth Clay

Suzanne's Blog | Dateline KNOCKOUT - Dr. Burzynski Response
 

Vap0rJay

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 22, 2011
358
224
Maryland
Don't get me wrong, I don't think they've considered this war over, and nor should we... but at this point, they need to create a new strategy. The same ol' stuff they've been saying for years, they know, isn't going to work here.

Get ready for gov't prop: E-CIG MADNESS!

This is yoru brain, this is your brain on e-cigs. Any questions?!? ;)
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
I haven't had a chance to watch the video yet, but....
Just curious, we know the FDA is corrupt (no need to mention that) but does that mean the American Cancer Society is also corrupt?
Not being sarcastic or a wise guy, but curious.

If ACS is not corrupt, why have they been fighting so hard to get e-cigarette sales banned? http://www.ttac.org/tcn/tfp/2010/may-2010/pdfs/Policy_Guidance_E-Cigarettes.pdf

Why do they publish statements that mislead the public to believe that all tobacco products carry an equal risk of disease and death, when the research shows that smokers in Sweden who switched to snus have no higher risk of disease and an equivalent life span to those who quit using any form of tobacco?

BioMed Central | Full text | You might as well smoke; the misleading and harmful public message about smokeless tobacco

If they are not corrupt, the only other explanation is that they must be dim-witted.
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
However, nothing is stopping peer-review of Dr. Burzynski's work. Nothing except Dr. Burzynski himself it would seem. The FDA can't stop that. And it just hasn't happened in any reputable peer-reviewed journal. And those journals frequently buck the FDA and the larger Government. Setting all the other questionable activities and accusations against Dr. Burzynski aside, ~that~ should be one of the most glaring alarms that this work might just not be truly miraculous.

Many of these peer-reviewed journals refuse to even consider publication of any article that bucks the current view of the "experts" in the field. The journal Tobacco Control, for example, has an editor now who will not publish any articles that paint any type of tobacco product in anything but a totally negative light.
 

Vap0rJay

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 22, 2011
358
224
Maryland
Many of these peer-reviewed journals refuse to even consider publication of any article that bucks the current view of the "experts" in the field. The journal Tobacco Control, for example, has an editor now who will not publish any articles that paint any type of tobacco product in anything but a totally negative light.

I don't doubt that, they would lose any type of grant/funding.
 

MagnusEunson

Bearded Super Villain
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 30, 2011
4,448
4,789
Behind you
Many of these peer-reviewed journals refuse to even consider publication of any article that bucks the current view of the "experts" in the field. The journal Tobacco Control, for example, has an editor now who will not publish any articles that paint any type of tobacco product in anything but a totally negative light.

That's not the case here. He won't freely allow his protocol to be used, he just won't share all aspects of it unless he has control. Makes it impossible to review. And when they say "experts" in the documentary it's always a circular experiment that he had the most control over. That's just bad science. The same bad science that has people questioning the arsenic-based lifeforms discovery of NASA. (Which NASA is trying to correct now by providing access.) Every day Universities release their own journals and papers that buck major FDA and Government pushes on supplements. That hasn't happened here and that's a major alarm bell.

At the end of 2011 (if schedules are met) he'll have produced more results. That nobody can actually properly understand and verify. So he still wouldn't have helped his cause because beyond this point it won't be the FDA who is being unreasonable. It will be him. They require _everyone_ go through the double-blind third-party testing after this point.

The FDA are buffoons. I'm there with you. They went wayyyyyyy overboard against the Dr. That doesn't mean the doctor has a "cure" or a miracle treatment. That only means they suppressed research. However, the Dr. himself is doing that too. That's the big huge alarm bell for me. -Magnus
 
Last edited:

MagnusEunson

Bearded Super Villain
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 30, 2011
4,448
4,789
Behind you
If ACS is not corrupt, why have they been fighting so hard to get e-cigarette sales banned? http://www.ttac.org/tcn/tfp/2010/may-2010/pdfs/Policy_Guidance_E-Cigarettes.pdf

Why do they publish statements that mislead the public to believe that all tobacco products carry an equal risk of disease and death, when the research shows that smokers in Sweden who switched to snus have no higher risk of disease and an equivalent life span to those who quit using any form of tobacco?

BioMed Central | Full text | You might as well smoke; the misleading and harmful public message about smokeless tobacco

If they are not corrupt, the only other explanation is that they must be dim-witted.

Or cautious....

The questions that professionally societies and regulators should be asking is about something being safer to the existing solutions? They don't. They just want ~zero~ risk with is unattainable and continues to cause Governments to make bad decisions at all levels that continue to hurt the populace. -Magnus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread