So, I decided to do a bit of reading on a topic near and dear to my heart... Propelyne Glycol. It's such a pretty word, and it happens to be one of the main 'substances' that I spend most of my day with. (More than my favored dihydrogen monoxide, if the truth were known)
Two sites that came up on my google search revealed that it was a clear, odorless, semi-transparent, synthetic liquid. Synthetic, meaning not-naturally occurring , as far as I recognize the term. They went on to list several things that it was used in, and then to reveal that it was considered generally safe, one even told me that it was typically used as an anti-freeze in places where leaks may come in to contact with food products.
I discovered that it metabolizes very quickly in the body, just a simple sugars do, breaking down into acids that traverse the blood stream and exit in a timely fashion. All very useful things to know, not exactly what I was looking for, so I read on.
Then I stumbled upon page after page talking about how it was toxic, and that workers that were around the substance were required (in bold) to wear protective gear. That it's a severe eye irritant and can cause liver and kidney abnormalities...and the only real thing that they seem to say is "It's used in ANTI-FREEZE!!!111!!!"
I realize that they're reaching quite a bit for most of these. Water is used in anti-freeze too, and I suppose that water is known to cause cancer, since we don't -really- know what causes it, why should we rule that one out? Just because we need water to survive, doesn't mean it doesn't have negative effects, right?
Irony aside for the moment, what exactly are these people hoping to achieve using scare tactics? I don't understand what would bring someone to even waste the half hour to write a (trashy looking) web-page dedicated to misinformation.
Insight?
-X
*edit - Hopefully I picked an appropriate forum for this, seemed to be relative. Apologies if it wasn't...and I'm sure I'm not digging up new ground here. This has probably been discussed over and over again.
Two sites that came up on my google search revealed that it was a clear, odorless, semi-transparent, synthetic liquid. Synthetic, meaning not-naturally occurring , as far as I recognize the term. They went on to list several things that it was used in, and then to reveal that it was considered generally safe, one even told me that it was typically used as an anti-freeze in places where leaks may come in to contact with food products.
I discovered that it metabolizes very quickly in the body, just a simple sugars do, breaking down into acids that traverse the blood stream and exit in a timely fashion. All very useful things to know, not exactly what I was looking for, so I read on.
Then I stumbled upon page after page talking about how it was toxic, and that workers that were around the substance were required (in bold) to wear protective gear. That it's a severe eye irritant and can cause liver and kidney abnormalities...and the only real thing that they seem to say is "It's used in ANTI-FREEZE!!!111!!!"
I realize that they're reaching quite a bit for most of these. Water is used in anti-freeze too, and I suppose that water is known to cause cancer, since we don't -really- know what causes it, why should we rule that one out? Just because we need water to survive, doesn't mean it doesn't have negative effects, right?
Irony aside for the moment, what exactly are these people hoping to achieve using scare tactics? I don't understand what would bring someone to even waste the half hour to write a (trashy looking) web-page dedicated to misinformation.
Insight?
-X
*edit - Hopefully I picked an appropriate forum for this, seemed to be relative. Apologies if it wasn't...and I'm sure I'm not digging up new ground here. This has probably been discussed over and over again.
Last edited: