I was (against my better judgement) taking a look at some of the other forums again last night and I stumbled on some completely crap and false information regarding GG so I thought I would answer here so everyone can see.
I know this guy is just one of the sheep, jumping on the anti-GG bandwagon, and I should ignore it, but sometimes I just feel I have to get the facts out, particularly when the statements are of this nature.
Allegation 1
A poster insinuated that the recent $ price drop on the GGTS was some sort of hook or false price fiddling to encourage sales.
I'd like to make it completely clear to everyone that the price drop was to do with the exchange rate fluctuations and nothing else!
No intrigue here, just Rob passing on his savings to the customer.
Allegation 2
The same poster hypothesized that the demand for GG has reduced. A conclusion drawn by said poster by using the highly scientific method of noting that they have seen GGs in stock more frequently recently.
Sorry man, you couldn't be more wrong.... the increased availability is due to much greater quantities in production and better stock management than before, that's all. Demand is higher than it has ever been at any time since GGs first became available and continues to rise daily.
Allegation 3
The same poster suggested that the GG business model was based on artificially limiting supply and an artificially increased price (like a drug dealer's "business model"). I strongly resent the inference here and I'd go so far as to say it might constitute libel.
I know this guy is just one of the sheep, jumping on the anti-GG bandwagon, and I should ignore it, but sometimes I just feel I have to get the facts out, particularly when the statements are of this nature.
Allegation 1
A poster insinuated that the recent $ price drop on the GGTS was some sort of hook or false price fiddling to encourage sales.
I'd like to make it completely clear to everyone that the price drop was to do with the exchange rate fluctuations and nothing else!
No intrigue here, just Rob passing on his savings to the customer.
Allegation 2
The same poster hypothesized that the demand for GG has reduced. A conclusion drawn by said poster by using the highly scientific method of noting that they have seen GGs in stock more frequently recently.
Allegation 3
The same poster suggested that the GG business model was based on artificially limiting supply and an artificially increased price (like a drug dealer's "business model"). I strongly resent the inference here and I'd go so far as to say it might constitute libel.

