("these" = SmartVapes Bridgeless 510 Dripping Atomizers)... thanks for the reminder to get these--I had forgotten.
I'm interested to hear your take on them once you get one. It's the only dripping atty I have, so I have no way to compare it to anything else (yet). So far (a week or so of vaping), I haven't had it die, or start tasting crappy, or clog up, or leak (hard for a five drop item to leak, but I have a drip shield on that also makes it look nicer, just in case). It's been pretty easy (at least predictable) to figure out how to use it. When first filled, it gurgles for a few hits. Then you get a half dozen hits with no gurgle, but still great taste and vapor. Then you get a hit or two with less taste and less vapor, so you put another 3-5 drops in. Looking at the ceramic cup while you're dripping lets you know when you've put enough in. The one time I overfilled it, nothing leaked out of the air holes into the drip shield, but the amount of juice overpowered the coil enough that it wasn't producing any vapor. I think I took a twisted up tissue and soaked up the juice submerging the coil to fix it. Oh, and thanks to whoever mentioned that the holes in the drip shield go on the mouthpiece end, not the battery end. I had it the wrong way because I figured that having the shield's air holes closer to the atty's air holes made sense. Didn't occur to me that if the atty leaked and the shield holes were at the bottom, juice would leak out of them much sooner. Didn't make any difference in the draw in this case anyway.
And if you don't mind another question, or a link to a thread here if I missed it: I've been changing flavors with the same atty, but since the (mostly light un-sweet fruit) flavors I use mix well, the "overlap" period when you get the taste of both turns out to be a nice thing. Do you clean the atty if it gets clogged or starts tasting bad, or just toss it (only $5). And what's the best way to clean a bridgeless atty like the SmartVapes? I read the cleaning instructions for the HH357, but that seems to be specific to the HH357, and I don't know if it's the right method for this atty.
Thanks for the thread (and the help).