FDA Reply from my Senator Dr. Rand Paul (Ky.) Your Thoughts ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Donita

Full Member
Feb 18, 2014
46
29
Stanford, Ky, USA

Recieved this today. What are your thoughts on his reply?



June 27, 2014


Dear Mrs. Young,

Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). I appreciate hearing your views on this agency and its practices.
As a physician, I understand the importance of safe medical treatment. Under current law, the FDA must approve all pharmaceuticals and medical devices before they can be marketed in the U.S. The FDA's approval process can last 10 years or longer, and often costs manufacturing companies hundreds of millions of dollars. Testing is used to guard against the potential of new drugs causing harm to patients and to prove their effectiveness; however, other patients who might have been helped by the medicine may suffer because of the FDA's delay.
With regard to food safety, the FDA plays an important role in ensuring that the American food supply is free from disease and fit for human consumption. However, recent salmonella and E. coli outbreaks have coincided with controversies about an FDA-approved process for combating these very diseases in certain beef products, and about the approval of genetically modified foods. Such dilemmas are evidence of the impossibility of regulating every dietary choice in a nation of over 310 million people. Moreover, increasingly belligerent SWAT-style enforcement tactics against Amish farmers, farm-to-fork picnic-goers, and herbal healers suggest that today's FDA can be more focused on harassing private citizens than it is ensuring the safety of our food supply.
Additional regulations, labeling requirements, and lengthy review and approval processes do not always protect the interests of every consumer, and frequently put the FDA at odds with its own mission. Other industries where public safety is paramount, such as consumer electrics and automobile crash testing, rely on independent certification processes from third parties.
On May 23, 2012, I introduced an amendment to S. 3187, the Food and Drug Administration User Fee Reauthorization, which would curb the FDA's overreach and abuse of power by disarming the FDA, put an end to raids on natural food stores and Amish farmers, and stop FDA censorship of truthful claims of dietary supplements. Unfortunately, my amendment was defeated, but rest assured that I will continue to work with my colleagues on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee to reform the FDA's practices and budget and to narrow its mission in order to better serve the public interest.
Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is an honor and a privilege to represent the Commonwealth of Kentucky in the United States Senate. Please continue to inform me of any thoughts you may have on federal legislative issues.


Sincerely,
forum

Rand Paul, MD
United States Senator
 

Myk

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2009
4,889
10,658
IL, USA
Doesn't seem he reads letters either (if what you wrote is what I think you wrote and the CASAA CTA). You gave him some ammo to go against the FDA and CDC for conspiring to do the public harm to keep the status quo instead of helping.

But at least he's closer to being on the right page than all the others I've read.

Perhaps would be worth getting the thoughts in order and making a call to his office to make sure someone hears what is being said.
 

pt91

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2009
901
2,073
AR
What did you ask to get that canned response?

Based on his thoughts about herbals healer harassment and FDA censorship of truthful claims of dietary supplements, I would say he is a raving lunatic. Unless he as a "doctor" has scientific studies to show that supplements are proven to do what they claim I don't know why he is defending false advertising and snake oil salesman.
Just my opinion.
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
This seems to be the important part

.....

On May 23, 2012, I introduced an amendment to S. 3187, the Food and Drug Administration User Fee Reauthorization, which would curb the FDA's overreach and abuse of power by disarming the FDA, put an end to raids on natural food stores and Amish farmers, and stop FDA censorship of truthful claims of dietary supplements......
 

Donita

Full Member
Feb 18, 2014
46
29
Stanford, Ky, USA
This is a portion of what I wrote. Sorry that I didn't put it with the orginal post.

This is important to me. I was a cigarette smoker of 35 plus years and tried multiple times and ways to quit. I tried going “cold turkey” and nicotine replacement therapies. These did not work for me. On February 15th of this year I purchased an E-cigarette and a bottle of e-liquid with a nicotine content of 1.8 %. As of today I have been cigarette free for 3 months and have stepped down the nicotine content of my e-liquid to .6 %. It is my belief after much research that this low-risk alternative will save not only my life but countless others as well. I have completely quit coughing and have not had the upper respiratory infection that I usually get this time of year and my overall health is greatly improved.

As I am sure you are aware our state leads the nation in percentage of smokers with 30.2% of the population. This is one of the reasons I believe it is important for us to ask the right questions and do intensive and unbiased research that will show that the use of e-cigarettes are a safer alternative to smoking and a proven success in helping thousands of people quit smoking tobacco.

Senator Paul, I thank you for taking the time to read this and hope that it will help you in making informed decisions on behalf of the people of Kentucky and the nation.


Sincerely,
Donita Young
 
Last edited:

Endor

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 31, 2012
687
2,074
Southern California
Doesn't seem he reads letters either (if what you wrote is what I think you wrote and the CASAA CTA). You gave him some ammo to go against the FDA and CDC for conspiring to do the public harm to keep the status quo instead of helping.

But at least he's closer to being on the right page than all the others I've read.

This was my thought. Certainly it seems like he recognizes that the FDA isn't doing their job now, so why increase their scope? I can get behind that.

But, dang, it sure is rambling. Unless the Amish are now mixing e-liquid, I don't see how that was relevant to your original email about e-cigarettes.
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
This is a portion of what I wrote. Sorry that I didn't put it with the orginal post.

This is important to me. I was a cigarette smoker of 35 plus years and tried multiple times and ways to quit. I tried going “cold turkey” and nicotine replacement therapies. These did not work for me. On February 15th of this year I purchased an E-cigarette and a bottle of e-liquid with a nicotine content of 1.8 %. As of today I have been cigarette free for 3 months and have stepped down the nicotine content of my e-liquid to .6 %. It is my belief after much research that this low-risk alternative will save not only my life but countless others as well. I have completely quit coughing and have not had the upper respiratory infection that I usually get this time of year and my overall health is greatly improved.

As I am sure you are aware our state leads the nation in percentage of smokers with 30.2% of the population. This is one of the reasons I believe it is important for us to ask the right questions and do intensive and unbiased research that will show that the use of e-cigarettes are a safer alternative to smoking and a proven success in helping thousands of people quit smoking tobacco.

Senator Paul, I thank you for taking the time to read this and hope that it will help you in making informed decisions on behalf of the people of Kentucky and the nation.


Sincerely,
Donita Young

Is what you wrote far too long or something?

What you posted above doesn't mention the FDA, so the response from the Senator, which does focus on the FDA, doesn't make any sense.
 
Last edited:

optsmk

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 4, 2009
1,022
729
Pleasanton, Ca.
IMO nobody in politics really wants to touch anything related to vaping. At least not when it comes to giving them any kind of approval. The only ones willing to say anything are those that want to ban them. I'm sure they don't mind banning them because even if they are proven 100% safe at some time in the future, these politicians can just say " Oh well, better to err on the side of public safety". That way they can make everyone think they are looking out for us, when they really ain't looking out for nothing. It's just a good CYA policy.
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
Edyle,

This was part of a response to the May 15th, 2014 hearing regarding e-cigarettes before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

What was the subject of the letter you sent to Dr Paul?

Based on what you wrote so far, your letter started with
"This is important to me"
 

shelley cerata

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 14, 2014
160
288
NOLA
Having worked in a Senatorial office, I can assure you that Senators *NEVER* get your individual messages unless you already have some sort of established relationship with the Senator or are otherwise a VIP. The legislative assistants/correspondents answer each letter with a canned response that they try to personalize, if they are decent at their job, and track how many letters/messages they get from constituents on each side of an issue. Seems like whomever answered this one didn't even make an effort to be on point.

The response tells me that he didn't even get your message and it was answered by an aide. Rand Paul is no friend of the FDA. If I were you I would call or stop by his office or whatever you have to do to speak to him in person.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread