reviewers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bishopheals

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 23, 2012
2,266
1,772
50
Staten Island
www.youtube.com
and its so obvious that you are totally committed to what you show and explain! one can really see how much you enjoy discovering new ways to further improve vaping not only for you but for everyone who is interested. thats a great mindset and fun to watch, so thanks alot for that!

btw i got my ss ggts yesterday and what was the first thing i tried? the BISH-TWIST and it works beautifully :)

WoW I have to be honest I'm really over whelmed how many people love my Bish Twist. I'm glad I can bring enjoyment to everyone.
 

Bishopheals

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 23, 2012
2,266
1,772
50
Staten Island
www.youtube.com
Imeo u have to send pbusardo a ggts. He once told me he would love to review one but he never got one. U know Odysseus is his best recommended RBA.

He doesn't even use Odysseus. When I demonstrated to him in front of Bruce making a dual highlander and having him try it first his eye balls said it all. He said he never thought he would get this result out of an Odysseus. Even Bruce was impressed so impressed next day he had me do his coils for his ody which started a huge line of folks wanting coils made.

His mod of choice is Tank and boge carto with his provari. When I see him at vapebash I'm going to introduce him to my Quad twist Highlander coils see how he likes them compared to my my dual highlander coils.
 

imeothanasis

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 13, 2009
47,882
34,510
Athens, Hellas
gg-goldengreek.com
Guys, maybe I was not clear enough about this thread. I dont want to say good or bad things about a reviewer. I want to correct some mistakes that reviewers do from time to time about general things and not about a spesific mod. For example, pbusardo said some things that I will now mention and he said those things not because he is bad or someone paid him to tell those things. I never thought of that and I hope that this is not happening with any reviewer. But he made those mistakes because he doesnt know engineering so its logical that he miss some things. Same is happening with other reviewers. They dont have bad intentions, they just dont have the knowledge.

For example, some things that I mention on pbusardo's video about ea mod:

1. he said that the manufacturer told him that the wombling of the telescope is because they made it like this to prevend crossthreating. That means that they gave him a totally wrong info. Telescope is wombling because:

a). If 2 surfaces dont meet each other there will be always a wombling between them
b). The less the threads that telescope has, the more the wombling.

Wombling also depends on threads's quality. Bad made threads drives to more wombling and more possibility for crossthreading. So the wombling in any part of a mod is not made to prevend crossthreading but it will drive to a crossthreading!

2. Brusardo said that a mechanical mod has no drop voltage in it. Thats not right. All mods have a drop voltage and it depends mostly on the resistance we put on it. The more the resistanse the less the drop. A low resistanse atomizer will drive to a big drop. Also the drop voltage depends on materials we use on connections. Pbusardo mention this later on its review so I didnt see a reason to measure voltage of the battery inside and outside the mod

These are general things. I dont critisize reviewer's opinion about a mod or the way he review it or if the mod is good or not. I hope that I made myself clear this time:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread