Guys, maybe I was not clear enough about this thread. I dont want to say good or bad things about a reviewer. I want to correct some mistakes that reviewers do from time to time about general things and not about a spesific mod. For example, pbusardo said some things that I will now mention and he said those things not because he is bad or someone paid him to tell those things. I never thought of that and I hope that this is not happening with any reviewer. But he made those mistakes because he doesnt know engineering so its logical that he miss some things. Same is happening with other reviewers. They dont have bad intentions, they just dont have the knowledge.
For example, some things that I mention on pbusardo's video about ea mod:
1. he said that the manufacturer told him that the wombling of the telescope is because they made it like this to prevend crossthreating. That means that they gave him a totally wrong info. Telescope is wombling because:
a). If 2 surfaces dont meet each other there will be always a wombling between them
b). The less the threads that telescope has, the more the wombling.
Wombling also depends on threads's quality. Bad made threads drives to more wombling and more possibility for crossthreading. So the wombling in any part of a mod is not made to prevend crossthreading but it will drive to a crossthreading!
2. Brusardo said that a mechanical mod has no drop voltage in it. Thats not right. All mods have a drop voltage and it depends mostly on the resistance we put on it. The more the resistanse the less the drop. A low resistanse atomizer will drive to a big drop. Also the drop voltage depends on materials we use on connections. Pbusardo mention this later on its review so I didnt see a reason to measure voltage of the battery inside and outside the mod
These are general things. I dont critisize reviewer's opinion about a mod or the way he review it or if the mod is good or not. I hope that I made myself clear this time
