I stand by my review. It stopped working. I even recorded the failure. I didn't make that up. The replacement, while still working, still has quality issues that if I had paid for it instead of getting it through Ecigadvanced, I'd be very upset and demanding a refund. Issues such as the 18350 batteries don't fit in it. The ID of the end cap is too small. Yes there will be a follow up review.
You mentioned the word fanboy a lot in your post. Interesting! Nobody is getting worked up here but you. Maybe you should calm down, count to ten, and try again.
Lastly, dude, it is just a review (ie, my opinion). As, in my opinion, after testing this device extensively, my opinion is that it needs a lot of refinement before I would recommend someone purchase it especially at the ridiculously inflated price point Smoktech makes their vendors sell it at.
You obviously have a different opinion of the device. Good for you. I'm glad you like yours. I hope it gives you years of trouble free service and keeps you off the analogs. Afterall, isn't that the point?
As an aside, I would like to commend All About Vapor. They are an excellent retailer with excellent customer service. It's not their fault the device wasn't ready for market yet. They, like so many other vendors when dealing with unproven new devices from China sometimes get a raw deal. They handled themselves with poise and professionalism, and that deserves mention.
I stand by my review. It stopped working. I even recorded the failure. I didn't make that up
I take that to mean that you would not change one single thing about it, is that a fair statement? If so, do you, for example, think that it's fair to the viewers of it to come away with the impression that the end cap will be loose and rattly on all VMax's? I know for a fact that that is not the case. As I said, mine fits like a glove. That is why I made the observation that your unit was either ********************* or b) was a "factory second" that failed to be manufactured according to the specifications and machining standards that are evident in my example of the VMax "1.0", and was "gleefully seized upon" (as I said in the "Long VMax Thread") by someone who saw his acquisition of it as a serendipitous occurrence that could be used to good effect to further a particular agenda, or c) just happened to be a lemon. And no one that I know of, myself included, has ever said that you staged the failure of the unit, and am frankly puzzled as to where you got that idea. This would be a good time to repeat something that I've previously stated; that it might have been a nice touch to review a functioning device, and rightly refer in it to the fact that a prior example of the VMax had failed during your testing of it.
"ridiculously inflated price" to me just underscores what I see as a lack of objectivity. Your opinion that you would still have to give the VMax a "good think" at half of that price does nothing IMO to boost my assessment of your objectivity.
"You mentioned the word fanboy a lot in your post. Interesting! Nobody is getting worked up here but you. Maybe you should calm down, count to ten, and try again".
I'm puzzled by your view that I'm "worked up", and I'm liking my first try just fine.
And what is it exactly that you find interesting? Is that a veiled reference to a psycholgical pnenomenon that William Shakespeare had in mind when he wrote the words "The [dude] doth protest too much, methinks." [From Shakespeare's Hamlet, Act III, scene II, where it is spoken by Queen Gertrude, Hamlet's mother. The phrase has come to mean that one can "insist so passionately about something not being true that people suspect the opposite of what one is saying]. In simpler prose - are you intent on dismissing my stated objections to your video by attributing them to "Fanboyism"? Undertones like that are why the term "Fanboy" seems to keep popping up, it seems to me.
"dude, it is just a review"
First, I find the appelation "dude" to be somewhat dismissive and disrespectful, and if you must use it in addressing me, I would prefer you referred to me as "Mr. Dude". TIA for that.
As for, "it's just a review"? well ... that's what we're talking about ... a review .... so I don't quite "get" that one. If your implication is that because it's "just a review" that anything contained in it can be presented in any manner at all, without being a valid topic of critique, including its fairness and objectivity, then I respectfully disagree. Similarly, if someone were standing on your toe, and their response to your query "Hey, could you please not stand on my toe?" was "hey, it's just a toe", you might gain some appreciation for my outlook on the phrase "it's just a review". Again, in simpler terms; you do reviews, you posted this thread in part to seek feedback on it, and I'm giving you mine.
Some quick points:
About 18350 batteries "not fitting into the device"(?). This again leads to to believe that your specimen is an "outlier"; one that is far from the norm. I have never heard that from anyone but you. The batteries do fit very snugly, but that might be considered a plus in an open mind. I put one (AW 18350 IMR) battery into the tube, the other one into the end cap, and presto, you're done. If you try it, you might see what I mean, unless, as I say, your test unit is very different from mine, acquired from AAV from the first batch of black ones. i think that probably at least 90% of all VMax owners use that battery, and if it truly "did not fit the devcie", I have to believe that we would be hearing from from more than just one person; namely, you. The apparent fact that you are the only one categorically stating that they do not fit once more goes directly to your credibility, which I am sincerely trying to help you maintain.
Lastly, did you happen to read posts 727 throught 765 of the thread I linked to, and if so, do you have any disagreements with any of the sentiments expressed in it. If so, I'd be interested in engaging in a further civil discussion of any of the points made in it. Just as you stand by your review, I stand by my review of your review, and hope that you can keep an open mind despite your understandable fondness for the subject of my review.