ditto^^^^^ - never could figure out why somebody would want to be reminded of the agida caused by a poster
much easier to just skip over posts that irk me! 
Snails - Response on Threads Part 3
- Thread starter classwife
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
ditto^^^^^ - never could figure out why somebody would want to be reminded of the agida caused by a poster
much easier to just skip over posts that irk me! 
lol. She ignored herself!
Tibs, you can't tell if someone else has you on ignore, that I know of. But you can tell who YOU have on ignore....
Good morning Tibs, Fran, CES, Tim, Gracie, me ('cuz I don't ignore myself)....Did I miss anyone?
nope - that's the quote that showed up in your post
so, yes - i'd know i'm on your ignore list if you quoted one of my 'ignored' posts! nope - that's the quote that showed up in your post
but you didn't get a notification other than my copy of what i saw?
nope - that's the quote that showed up in your post
What?
reading back
yup! no other notification ....................
where's that classy when you need her?
i insist 'ignored' people deserve to know when they were deemed important enough to end up on somebody's 'ignore list'
IDK if I can 'like' that post CES. 
I suppose 'agitator' depends on personal perspective...
I'm probably an agitator to some, they are agitators to me.
However, most of my posts were all 'defensive'. Replies to attacks. Not attacking. Kinda philosophical.
I suppose 'agitator' depends on personal perspective...
I'm probably an agitator to some, they are agitators to me.
However, most of my posts were all 'defensive'. Replies to attacks. Not attacking. Kinda philosophical.
yup! no other notification ....................
where's that classy when you need her?
i insist 'ignored' people deserve to know when they were deemed important enough to end up on somebody's 'ignore list'
oooh! now that would ratchet the tension up another notch.
IDK if I can 'like' that post CES.
I suppose 'agitator' depends on personal perspective...
I'm probably an agitator to some, they are agitators to me.
However, most of my posts were all 'defensive'. Replies to attacks. Not attacking. Kinda philosophical.
s'okay if you don't 'like' it Atty. It won't hurt my feeling none
IMO, 'defensive' tends to lead to people poking a little harder....nonchalant and unbothered tends take more wind out of other people's sails...
s'okay if you don't 'like' it Atty. It won't hurt my feeling none
IMO, 'defensive' tends to lead to people poking a little harder....nonchalant and unbothered tends take more wind out of other people's sails...
Yeah, it does do that....
Some things just can't remain uncorrected.
For example....
"Gee CES....I'm so amazed that you think science is all hokum. You shouldn't insult all the scientists like you did in that last post of yours. They should demand an apology of you. That scientific data is important to the case. I don't know how you could say they should all be arrested and re-educated! Wow."
Now of course, anyone that knows you (like us in this thread) would just laugh at that. Knowing you never said it. But if you were making a post in the OUTSIDE, and people otherwise didn't know you (you are just another one of the 100,000 posters to them)...you might want to correct that....
It libels you in the thread......
Yeah, it does do that....
Some things just can't remain uncorrected.
For example....
"Gee CES....I'm so amazed that you think science is all hokum. You shouldn't insult all the scientists like you did in that last post of yours. They should demand an apology of you. That scientific data is important to the case. I don't know how you could say they should all be arrested and re-educated! Wow."
Now of course, anyone that knows you (like us in this thread) would just laugh at that. Knowing you never said it. But if you were making a post in the OUTSIDE, and people otherwise didn't know you (you are just another one of the 100,000 posters to them)...you might want to correct that....
It libels you in the thread......
see, atty - that's where you go wrong!
the proper answer from ces in this case and suited for the outside would bemea culpa - how could i??????? let me go and fix this right now!
Yeah, it does do that....
Some things just can't remain uncorrected.
For example....
"Gee CES....I'm so amazed that you think science is all hokum. You shouldn't insult all the scientists like you did in that last post of yours. They should demand an apology of you. That scientific data is important to the case. I don't know how you could say they should all be arrested and re-educated! Wow."
Now of course, anyone that knows you (like us in this thread) would just laugh at that. Knowing you never said it. But if you were making a post in the OUTSIDE, and people otherwise didn't know you (you are just another one of the 100,000 posters to them)...you might want to correct that....
It libels you in the thread......
i guess i'll apologize to myself, and BTW, some scientists ARE idiots.
but...really, since the point of many of the posts I've read out there is to twist what someone else says into a "have you stopped beating your wife?" question, there is no answer that will make people change their minds
see, atty - that's where you go wrong!
mea culpa - how could i??????? let me go and fix this right now!
see, that's the other problem with the forum. We STILL don't have a good sarcasm font.
yup - misinterpretation happens very easily on a forum and in the outside they're known for playing dumb and it's done on purpose
that's why i don't post in the outside as a rule, i can't be bothered -
only in certain threads do i take the time to get to the bottom of a possible misunderstanding and snails is one of them
case in point - our bear! i'm sure, now that bear knows me better and vice versa, those 'mean posts' from the earlier years look different now
and that's been the case with most regulars in this thread - i recall pms with frannie and atty to clarify thankfully, by now we know each other so well misunderstandings/misinterpretations happen rarely
case in point - our bear!
i'm sure, now that bear knows me better and vice versa, those 'mean posts' from the earlier years look different now and that's been the case with most regulars in this thread - i recall pms with frannie and atty to clarify
thankfully, by now we know each other so well misunderstandings/misinterpretations happen rarely only in certain threads do i take the time to get to the bottom of a possible misunderstanding and snails is one of them
case in point - our bear!
and that's been the case with most regulars in this thread - i recall pms with frannie and atty to clarify
Yep.
Of course we also have a vested interest (internet friendship) in maintaining communication. I've never enjoyed games that involve deliberately misunderstanding someone just to make a point. (I'm just a timid soul with a very low rating on the witch meter
) 
Good morning
Working on the switch over now
Moving on to Part 4 :
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...s-response-threads-part-4-a.html#post13960441
Working on the switch over now
Moving on to Part 4 :
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...s-response-threads-part-4-a.html#post13960441
- Status
