lights on 


NO, IT WAS NOT.......PRIOR TO THREADS, MARTHA ASKED A QUESTION ABOUT NO ONE RESPONDING TO THREADS, FROM THERE IT WENT STRAIGHT TO STORIES ABOUT ACTUAL SNAILS. GIVE IT UP, ATTY. I WAS THERE, YOU WEREN'T. CLASSY STRAIGHTENED IT OUT. LET IT GO. YOUR FIRST SENTENCE ABOUT THIS WAS CORRECT. THE REST WAS TOTALLY WRONG.That's OK, just don't try math.
So "snail" wasn't originally a direct reference to "slow threads". The point wasn't "defining snail" the point was it started off as one thing, and has become something else. But the group there (the snails) were originally known for helping slow threads get a response in the earlier years of ECF, in addition to whatever the hell else they were doing.
... you won't be up so early.![]()
hardlyDid u have your first nap of the day?![]()
Have you read it, Kat? The Snails Tales story came BEFORE you. It's all there for people to see.Yes it was. Nothing to do with Snails.
I was a latecomer to the Response on Threads (no mention of snails); I started with V4L and then quickly moved to "Burning Cartomisers" when our posts about, ahem, burning cartomizers were being deleted from V4L. The Burning thread was my home here from 2010 for many years. But many of you (Katmar, Tibs, CES) were also in the Burning thread, and Whiskey and Pre-Vets--and you led me to Response on Threads.
I have no idea what the disagreement is about.It was a thread about slow response on threads--originally--and it was started by Martha.
As you were.


hardlymaking my way through the news
![]()
lol, kat, give it a break. by the time the thread really took off it was deej and norie carrying it. and before tweety's time? hardly ...
Good one. You have no clue....Mr. Love, tolerance and compassion. Yep, for everyone, as this shows. True colors, my friend.

