Ah, kin, you seen it too? Either I'm not really as crazy as I thought or this is mass hysteria. 8-o
OTD,
A more tailored approach would have been to fit the WTA level to the individuals based on all the empirical mumbo-jumbo I've been spouting.
...
....
The black helicopters arent here now.....lol
Ok, my observation posting is back up now that we have the anonymity issue resolved.
My apologies to all for jumping the gun on something I thought was out.
The black helicopters arent here now.....lol
J...I see myself as WTA low more than nic low on the importance scale.
I'm sure that won't work for everyone. Many get the itch that the WTA, snus or nasal snuff is ok, but they see a big diff when hitting the stronger nic or a Stonewall.
Some will need both.
It's just a matter of finding what is satifying your urges, one step at a time, to make your tool kit tailored to your needs.
... The group that works all contain tobacco alkaloids and nicotine. The group that doesn't has nicotine without full-spectrum alkaloids.
WTA is as close as liquid can get, apparently, to duplicating the impact of smoking without burning anything!
...
In your list of what doesn't work (on it's own at least), presumably you'd
include vaping purified nicotine juice ?
Do you think you need to vape, as well as use snus, because snus don't have enough nicotine,
or is it that they they present too much claggy 'else' along with their proportion
of nicotine, such that vaping 'tops up' the clean nicotine requirement?
Given a lot of people can (and have) made cruder versions of DVap's WTA,
using less than his extremely-pure solvent techniques,
do you see this as a way forward to solving dissatisfaction with pure-nicotine.
Or do snus provide you with something WTA doesn't ?