• This forum has been archived

    If you'd like to post a thread, post it here instead!

    View Forum

Some awesome things I learned from RachelCoffe

Status
Not open for further replies.

Danesnpits

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2011
1,154
239
Aberdeen, Saskatchewan
So Blaine had up on the facebook group, Canadains against the ban of ecigarettes, a link to sign a petition. So I put the petition on my facebook page, and asked for supporters to sign it. I got this friend of mine posting things about it, and asked our wonderful Rachel Coffe for advice. I can't believe you guys that people still think like this! So I am copying and pasting the convo here. I want you all to read and learn from this becuase we have a huge fight ahead of us with HC. I learned a heck of alot last night when Rachel helped me along the way on what to say regarding this whole issue with ecigs in Canada. Here it is! Comments welcome

Friend asks, "did you read some of the FDA stuff? Ecigarettes marketed as nicotine-free usually do have nicotine in them, and products similar to anti-freeze and it isn't actually known if ecigarettes are safer than smoking. I think the idea is a good one but it seems like it still needs some work."

So after she posted this, I asked Rachel what to do. I needed to educate my facebookers. So Rachel came up with this. It is brilliant!

the FDA claimed that e-cig liquid contained carcinogens - specifically, tobacco-specific nitrosamines. Well here's what they didn't tell you: a day's worth of e-juice contains about 8 nanograms of those carcinogens (TSNA's). A pack of... Marlboros contains about 126,000 nanograms of the same. (And Marlboros also contain tons of other toxic crap - crap that is not found in e-juice whatsoever.)also 8 nanograms is the exact same amount you'd find in an FDA-approved nicotine patchIt would take over 43 years of vaping, every day...to reach the same level of TSNA's that you find in just one pack of cigs.

Exactly one prefilled cartridge, of a kind that isn't even sold anymore...had a trace amount (that's an amount so small that it can't even be accurately measured) of nicotine in it. Did you also know that there is actually more nicotine in ...a tomato, than was found in that one cartridge? Nicotine occurs naturally in a number of plants, including tomatoes.I assure you, liquids that are nicotine-free are invariably nicotine-free. Quality control is already much better since 2009, and will continue to get better. Now that the U.S. (& soon, Canada) will be engaging in regulatory oversight, to make sure that bottles, cartridges etc contain exactly what they say they contain...professional, quality manufacturers will be fine. People making crap will be told 'no.'

Regarding Antifreeze, PG (propylene glycol) is the main ingredient in e-juice for e-cigs. What you may not know is that it is found almost everywhere. You've probably eaten some today; it's used in countless foods, drinks, cakes, you name i...t..PG is also the main ingredient in theatrical fog; it's used as the carrier for the medicine in asthma inhalers; it's even used in some hospitals as an air disinfectant (PG kills a lot of germs on contact). Suffice to say, it's everywhere you go. It is not toxic or harmful at all. Nowadays, PG is also used in antifreeze. This is in order to make the antifreeze that much less toxic, in case some idiot tries to drink it. PG is used safely in your margarine, cakes, and a bazillion other foods & drinks. The PG in e-cig liquid is food-grade, non-toxic, and perfectly safe. PG isn't toxic. But the stuff they used in antifreeze before they started using PG...was very toxic. Someone clued in & said hey, let's stop using poison & use harmless PG instead. Not only is it non-toxic, but it actually works better. It is not "antifreeze". Now you might say "wait a minute, what about DEG?" Well...in 2009, in exactly one prefilled cartridge, from a company that no longer even exists...the FDA found 1% DEG (diethylene glycol) in the liquid. In literally tens of thousands of tests since 2009...no one, in the entire world, including the FDA...has ever found ANY amount of DEG in any other cartridge, bottle of e-juice, etc etc etc. Ever. No, DEG. This was literally a one-time thing that pointed out one thing only: that exactly one crappy little company, which made a shoddy product & went out of business...had lax quality controls..DEG)...in order to actually be poisoned. Yeah...the FDA didn't point that out, did they? The only cartridge in the history of time that they ever found it in wasn't remotely toxic, haha. Also, vapers don't drink the liquid; they vapourize it.

This is all completely moot, because nowhere in the world are you ever going to find DEG in any of the liquids for e-cigs. It was a one-time fluke at the time from some bargain-basement company...has never happened since, not anywhere...and...[/B] it could not happen. That's what regulation brings to the table. It ensures that companies who market & sell things to consumers will be subject to ongoing, routine testing to make sure that their products contain exactly what they claim to contain - no more, no less. As to "safer than smoking" claims...actually, several studies have now been done that now scientifically, clinically prove that vaping e-juice via e-cigs is many thousands of times safer than smoking. Eliquid is not antifreeze. No-nic liquids do not contain nic (that was a one-time finding from a crap company, and they found less nic than you'd naturally find in a tomato) ... and it is now clinically proven that vaping is many thousands of times safer than smoking, i.e. no more harmful than drinking caffeinated coffee. When the FDA said there were carcinogens in e-juice...a day's worth of e-juice contained 8 nanograms (same as the FDA-approved nic patch does)
a pack of marlboros contains 126,000 nanograms plus all kinds of other crap that isn't found in ejuice

It would take over 43 years of vaping every day, to take in the same level of tobacco-specific nitrosamines as in just one pack of cigs. The FDA had their ... handed to them in court. They totally lost. They were obliterated and last month ...admitted final defeat. If they had been right about any of their bull...., that wouldn't have happened. It didn't, because they were wrong. HC, you're next! We Canadian Vapers are coming after you


Friend says, "I guess we read different stuff. The stuff I read claimed that all but one cartridge tested contained nicotine. And the antifreeze stuff was diethylene glycol (toxic to humans), not polypropylene glycol."

diethylene glycol was found in exactly one cartridge, in the history of the world. the DEG was 1% of the liquid. a 150 pound adult would need to drink 6804 cartridges worth of liquid in a day at that level, to be poisoned. Diethylene glycol... has never ever been found in any other e-cig liquid or cartridges, in any amount. "you may as well say that if a deadly spider was found in one box of cereal, one time...that it means that every box of cereal has deadly spiders in it" The DEG was found exactly one time, in a non-toxic amount...and has never ever been found anywhere in any amount since, in e-cig liquid. Case closed. Now that the FDA (& soon, HC) will also be adding their own quality control...DEG will certainly never be found in eliquid for vaping consumers.

The bottom line I am trying to say here, FDA's 2009 results have long been debunked, many times over. Canada needs to follow suite. So would all my friends who support ME, and who support a healthy lifestyle, one that includes a smoke free life, whom I couldh ave not done without the use of ecigs, please sign the petition?


Friend says, "well, you're more familiar with it than me Krista. I hope it is a good way to quit smoking and that the FDA stuff is inaccurate."

Like I can not win here can I. All the information RachelCoffe gave me and accurate info no less, I still get the I hope the FDA stuff is inaccurate. SHEESH!!!!!:blink::confused::?::(:mad:
 
Last edited:

kingcobra

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 17, 2011
810
415
65
Canada
Thanks for passing this along. It would be nice to have juice regulated, but the risk is so extremely low that I don't think it matters. One of the cool things about being unregulated is that costs are kept to a minimum, and smaller suppliers can get in on the action where they might not be able to otherwise. In essence, there's no real effect going on right now as we speak anyway, HC is making some noise but the show goes on.

I will admit that there are some issues on their end, and the concept of a lesser evil isn't an option that they are dealing with. So if vaping is even a little bit potentially harmful, if you can vape for 45 years and get a pack of cigarettes' worth of harm, they will deal with the matter in those terms, and say well we can't approve it if it's known to do any sort of harm. So the thinking has to change here, as we all know, and maybe it will some day but I'm not holding my breath here on it happening anytime soon.

As vaping grows though, the chances may increase, but it will be a slow process at best. There's still a list of supplements that I take which they don't approve, DHEA for instance, I ordered some when it first came out 15 years ago or whatever, it's still not approved and you have to hope your order makes it through customs. That doesn't stop anyone by the way, it just makes it more expensive to get. So that's the worst case scenario for us, which really isn't that bad, so to hell with them :)
 

hotone

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 1, 2010
499
50
Toronto
If I may clarify a couple of points in the OP.

Propylene glycol is widely used in both human and animal food because it is proven to be safe. It replaced ethylene glycol in anti freeze due to EGs sweet taste and attractiveness to pets. Thousands of pets per year are poisoned by ethylene glycol.

Diethylene glycol is a highly toxic substance used in tobacco processing (and in anti-freeze) and is NOT used to manufacture electronic cigarette liquid. Because it used in tobacco processing, cheaper, less refined nicotine may become contaminated with traces of diethylene glycol.

I would recommend checking out some of the stuff from Kristin Noll-Marsh
CASAA | The Consumer Advocates for Smoke-Free Alternatives Association
 

cactusgirl

Sage Tribal Queen
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2011
1,937
1,441
Dartmouth, NS
You both did a really good job at trying to explain or perhaps persuade this naysayer. It may have been a bit more powerful and persuasive though if you were able to insert links to reference your claims. Your naysayer friend only knows what she has read so she is going by that and as far as she is concerned, she is the 'informed' one and wants to warn others...if your responses could show her and prove to her that the FDA's claims were false OR at the very least, link her to the studies that prove that vaping IS, in fact, safer than smoking cigarettes, she probably would have backed off a bit. Sadly, her last comment suggests that she's not convinced by your word alone.
 

Danesnpits

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2011
1,154
239
Aberdeen, Saskatchewan
You both did a really good job at trying to explain or perhaps persuade this naysayer. It may have been a bit more powerful and persuasive though if you were able to insert links to reference your claims. Your naysayer friend only knows what she has read so she is going by that and as far as she is concerned, she is the 'informed' one and wants to warn others...if your responses could show her and prove to her that the FDA's claims were false OR at the very least, link her to the studies that prove that vaping IS, in fact, safer than smoking cigarettes, she probably would have backed off a bit. Sadly, her last comment suggests that she's not convinced by your word alone.

I know honey! I was miffed! Rachel and I were conversing all night about this last night, and were so ticked off, and of course Rachel being the Goddess of ECIGS who has an insane amount of knowledge, still couldn't get through to this woman. You know, said friend of mine, grew up across the back alley from me, we both got into breeding bengal cats, she went onto becoming a bear hunter,,or whatever you call it, through the university, and I got bear paw tattoos..we just have alot in common until I asked to buy a stud cat of hers, for my bengal breeding program and she found out that I did not register them. Well...that was the end of that 32 year friendship. Not surprised she came on my facebook today to spew out her mouth!
 

cactusgirl

Sage Tribal Queen
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2011
1,937
1,441
Dartmouth, NS
I know honey! I was miffed! Rachel and I were conversing all night about this last night, and were so ticked off, and of course Rachel being the Goddess of ECIGS who has an insane amount of knowledge, still couldn't get through to this woman. You know, said friend of mine, grew up across the back alley from me, we both got into breeding bengal cats, she went onto becoming a bear hunter,,or whatever you call it, through the university, and I got bear paw tattoos..we just have alot in common until I asked to buy a stud cat of hers, for my bengal breeding program and she found out that I did not register them. Well...that was the end of that 32 year friendship. Not surprised she came on my facebook today to spew out her mouth!

Ugh...sounds like she just wants to be ornery. Not much you can do with people like that, but it's good that you posted what you did ~ for every person that comments, there are probably 10 others that won't comment but will read everything that is said so hopefully you educated a few silent 'supporters' anyway!
 

kalvinf

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 8, 2011
329
148
Hamilton Canada
Danes,

there seems to be a heavy added layer of your friend carrying past luggage into this "debate" on e cigs. But even still it seems to be the classic thing of people only hear what they want to hear. This discussion could have been about anything, not just e cigs, and would have gone the same way. If someone has a favourite way to view something, no amount of explaining or detailed proof is going to sway that - homosapean trait (read people trait).

Possibly giving short replies with links to studies may have been more useful; people generally don't read the "wall of text" that comes with internet and email technology especially when given as or viewed as one's own opinion.
 

Danesnpits

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2011
1,154
239
Aberdeen, Saskatchewan
I am in Winnipeg tonight, getting ready to fly home in the morning. Can't read the OP because of the font color, but when I get home to my own computer I will copy and paste and read away.
So glad you guys are fighting.... :)
Sorry Girlsaint! I changed the font color again after Kams Cats couldn't read it either! Now what should I do? I will try again to change it. What colors can't you read? The lime Green? Or is the red? The white? Sorry everyone!!!
 

AllYourBase

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 14, 2011
349
108
38
Alberta
Sorry Girlsaint! I changed the font color again after Kams Cats couldn't read it either! Now what should I do? I will try again to change it. What colors can't you read? The lime Green? Or is the red? The white? Sorry everyone!!!

The green was bad because it hurt the eyes, but the white is totally unreadable (White text on a white background.)

Just go with italicized black text for the quotes. Or any other dark color.
 

Danesnpits

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2011
1,154
239
Aberdeen, Saskatchewan
The green was bad because it hurt the eyes, but the white is totally unreadable (White text on a white background.)

Just go with italicized black text for the quotes. Or any other dark color.
That is weird cuz I can't read black text! You can't read white..boy I can't please me, I can't please anyone today! LORD!!! Ok, so I changed it to I think a default..is it good now?
 

DemonCleaner

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 10, 2010
557
284
47
Calgary, Alberta. Canada
People with little or no interest in ecigs aren't really going to put much time into researching them. They'll see the FDA thing online because it's probably the first thing that pops up on google, or whatever, and they're all, "ok they're bad and have antifreeze in them" they don't bother looking much further after that because they A: don't care, B: are against ecigs, C: don't really want to quit cigarettes. People like us will research the everliving .... out of vaping because we want to quit cigarettes, and are smart enough to know that there's always a little bit of politics and financial motivation involved when it comes to government. They don't always have our best interests in mind. That's my take on it, I suppose.
 

sparky604

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 2, 2010
217
22
Surrey, BC
Ive got just two things to say to this.

One, why oh why did you chose the light gray text on a white background? My eyes hurt now :(

Two, thankyou oh thankyou for not choosing the only worse option than that, bright yellow text on a white background!!

Hit Ctrl-A or click Edit -> Select All and it'll highlight everything on the page, should make it easier to read.
 

kingcobra

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 17, 2011
810
415
65
Canada
So I decided to do a search on this and here's what I found, the usual stuff, but with e-cigarettes being portrayed like this it's no wonder people have issues with being misinformed:

1. Electronic cigarettes contain an antifreeze compound known as Diethylene Glycol. They just say it does, not even that it might. We all know the story here but they aren't telling it. Never mind the countless toxins in tobacco smoke, and the fact that they are there for certain with every puff.

2. Electronic cigarettes also contain "cancer causing compounds such as nitrosamines." They don't mention how much is in tobacco or whether the amount in electronic cigarettes should be a worry, or the fact that smoking tobacco definitely causes cancer at a high rate, while it's unlikely that electronic cigarettes ever would.

3. "Bad marketing" meaning creating delicious flavors may actually entice smoking rather than curb it. This one's pretty funny of course, I think that they are thinking this is a stop smoking aid rather than a much safer alternative. Is there any doubt though that we are dealing with idiots here?

4. Nicotine: Nicotine is evil in their eyes of course, although they don't really get that both choices involve nicotine.

5. Electronic cigarettes contain tetramethylpyrazine. I'm not really up on this one other than the fact I believe the amount contained is much lower than what has been found to cause brain damage. I do believe that the people who wrote this used the higher dosage though.

6. PG causes gastrointestinal irritation. I suppose if you drank enough of it this is possible, although someone needs to mention to these clowns that we don't drink any of it.

7. Here's my favorite:

"There is also a widespread concern that electronic cigarette consumption may promote drug use. There are reports of liquid nicotine being substituted with liquid ..., a popular potent ......... resin. If electronic cigarette e liquid is replaced with addictive drugs, it can become highly damaging to health."

Did he or she say widespread concern? Anyone know which vendors sell this? :D

8: Cost effectiveness. Electronic cigarettes are much more cost effective and that's listed as one of the "dangers."

Finally they sum up by asking whether they are good for you or not and the answer is no. They finally concede that they are less dangerous than smoking. I suppose if you were a non smoker it is possible to be this stupid, where you're contemplating continuing to smoke, quitting altogether, or vaping, and you're completely indifferent to all, and they suggest in that case you just give up nicotine altogether.

They don't even seem to contemplate that nicotine use may be a pleasurable experience and even to the point where people are willing to sacrifice many years of life expectancy to experience it. So when an alternative comes along where you can get the benefits without any real costs in terms of health, at least outside of the mentally ......ed view on this that they espouse, then anyone who is this concerned about the health of their fellow man should be ecstatic I would think. Ahh, if so many people weren't brain damaged, what a wonderful world it would be....
 

Danesnpits

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 14, 2011
1,154
239
Aberdeen, Saskatchewan
Ive got just two things to say to this.

One, why oh why did you chose the light gray text on a white background? My eyes hurt now :(

Two, thankyou oh thankyou for not choosing the only worse option than that, bright yellow text on a white background!!
I am so sorry for the text color. I changed it 3 times from green, to a wheat color and now this standard silver and everytime I changed it, I got a complaint and I am so very sorry. I don't know what to do now to make it readable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread