Thank you. But I'm completely fazed as to why you would think it a bit snarky. I think I'm being civil, inquisitive but civil.
The shortness of the reply and content set off my "spidey sense" on that one. Rather than let this useful thread go in a direction that would warrant closure I stepped in and attempted to put it back on track. Perhaps my attempt at humour with the "enquiring mods want to know" failed in cross pond translation or age gap
By all means carry on.I think all of this is relevant and many of my questions remain unanswered. I have a few more.
We'll take that under advisement, though the letter states that posting it or its contents would be part of the acceptable resolution. That is a call for Rolygate or SmokeyJoe to make and I'll confer with them. It may very well be the most prudent course of action to remove itI do politely suggest you take down the lawyers letter though. Clearly states on TW's website about copyright and ownership of all materials published. Just saying you don't want to go there![]()
Now that we've cleared the air I do apologize if you felt singled out. That was not the intent. But it is "my job".Oldsoldier - I know you are a forum manager. But you sure jumped on me pretty quick. I've checked all my posts and I don't see any that are disruptive. Chill Fella![]()
Cheers!