SXmini Q Class Powered by YiHi SX450 chip

Status
Not open for further replies.

Croak

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 13, 2012
2,582
4,449
60
Right behind you...
Looks kind of cool, but how about an 80W dual batt mod just for a change of pace Yihi?

It would be well within safety limits, and the battery life would be pretty good.

Just a thought.

They already make something like that in partnership with VF, the VaporFlask SX. 100 watts, but parallel, so the amp draw per battery is halved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwbnyc

Elmasryahmed

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 10, 2014
98
46
Dubai, uae
As long as they fit in the mod then go for it! lol Kidding! But if you should decide to do it please upload a good photo of your face so we can compare before and after photos. ha ha

Exactly, so I think this debate and finger pointing to Yihi vs The dna is pointless,
Cheap under rated battery for hi wattage is a safety concern, sufficient battery safety knowledge is a must no matter what's the moders/chip maker announce.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

retird

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 31, 2010
5,133
5,862
North Side
Or in any high wattage device....two 10 amp re-wrapped 18650 also fits in a soon to be released Q....

Exactly, so I think this debate and finger pointing to Yihi vs The DNA is pointless,
Cheap under rated battery for hi wattage is a safety concern, sufficient battery safety knowledge is a must no matter what's the moders/chip maker announce.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly..... As said: Cheap under rated battery for hi wattage is a safety concern, sufficient battery safety knowledge is a must no matter what's the moders/chip maker announce.
 

KenD

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 20, 2013
5,396
9,257
48
Stockholm, Sweden
kennetgranholm.com
Exactly..... As said: Cheap under rated battery for hi wattage is a safety concern, sufficient battery safety knowledge is a must no matter what's the moders/chip maker announce.
Yes, but moders/chip manufacturers must learn to take their responsibility.

Sent from my M7_PLUS using Tapatalk
 

retird

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 31, 2010
5,133
5,862
North Side
So the IPV5 also just got announced, which appears to be the Q-class's cheaper cousin using the SX330-200 chip:

IPV5 Box Mod 200w $50.34 | Vaping Cheap

Any 200 watt device using 2 18650 batteries???? I'm out...... battery safety means something to me.... I've seen pictures of faces changed forever....missing teeth, eyes, and noses.... thank goodness it doesn't happen more often but once is too many IMO .. come on manufacturers GET IT RIGHT....

not trying to scare or alarm..... google e-cig explosion for yourself
 
Last edited:

roxynoodle

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jun 19, 2014
15,344
37,213
Ohio
I would like to clarify a few things.

The previous sx350j board could be wired either in parallel or series configurations. Modder's choice. In parallel Yihi listed it at 92% efficiency, and in series up to 96% efficiency (under 75W).

I also recall PBusardo testing the sx mini s class at 60W with subpar batteries and the mod wouldn't fire. It had a built in safety feature for people who were clueless about choosing appropriate batteries. I can't imagine Yihi hasn't incorporated that into the new mod as well. It was actually one of my reasons for buying my sx minis as I felt that gave them merit as being high quality devices.
 

Quantum Mech

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2015
1,202
1,804
UK
Your need at least 3.7v in your batteries to pull 200w
So far as evaluating whether the product can perform what it claims, we only need to concern ourself with a charged battery and how it performs. So far as when the battery is below maximum charge, we don't know anything about how the product performs. For example, it may limit the maximum current draw below a defined voltage, just as other chips do.

Yep look at the M & ML, try pulling 75w with you battery below 3.7v

They just sag and the board stops it firing

If anyone needs the full 200w think they will need over 4v to satisfy the board

But like you say, we'll see when they are out what they can do

As many of us will be buying them for sure there wont be a shortage of testers :thumb:
 

Yozhik

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 4, 2015
925
1,359
Chicago, IL
The previous sx350j board could be wired either in parallel or series configurations. Modder's choice. In parallel Yihi listed it at 92% efficiency, and in series up to 96% efficiency (under 75W).

Voltage step-down converters are typically more efficient than voltage step-up converters, thus using a serial configuration gives you slightly more efficient battery usage over the full range of output voltages.
 

BobC

Reformed Squonker
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 11, 2013
4,415
16,202
Downtown Charleston, SC
Yes, but moders/chip manufacturers must learn to take their responsibility.

Sent from my M7_PLUS using Tapatalk

Not sure what you mean here, the major chip makers already measure and take battery charge level into consideration and major mod makers including internal batteries use the correct batteries.
As there's no way to instantly measure a battery's capacity, it's up to the user to purchase batteries appropriate for their vaping level
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmasryahmed

Vlad1

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 8, 2014
1,444
1,459
Earth
Probably a 200W preheat, followed by a lower setting. More than enough for any TC user. The real question from me is if the software is as meh as escribe. I don't want to use a USB-tethered 90s-style user interface to configure my mod.

I may be able to give you some insight now that I've played with the SXI-Q software a bit on the ML. Whether or not this crosses over to the Sx450 only time will tell.

To start the SXI-Q is not necessary at all on the ML unless you want to do a firmware update or create custom output curves where you'd use S1-S5 rather than the Preset modes of Powerful, Powerful+, Eco, Standard or Soft. Everything else can be configured directly on the device. In regard to the power output the approach of SXI-Q is not the same as Escribe where in Escribe you can set a static Preheat for a static period of time when in Temp limiting mode. SXI-Q you set variable output levels with the use of 21 data points over a 10 sec period for either Power or Temp Limiting mode up to 100W in the first second on the ML. Another point worth noting is while it's necessary to use Escribe to set a custom TCR for different wire types it's not necessary to use SXI-Q for the ML as it can be done on the device directly but optionally can be done through the software. Also while Escribe attempts to provide approximations of real time data, SXI-Q does not and is mainly a configuration tool for the settings for the vaping experience. There's no Battery analyzer, Watt Hour calculator, Mod Analyzer, Atty Analyzer, Device Monitor etc.. that one would use within SXI-Q to get the device up and vaping.

The interface itself could use some work. It could use some mouse over help tags, more copy and save fields, direct input fields rather than drag and drop, disabling selections like Ni200, TI when Power mode is selected and probably more I haven't come across with my limited use, but overall it's not terrible. Being it's mainly a tool for configuring output settings it's much less complex than Escribe so easier to get setup and vaping for the average consumer. It took me all of 10 min to figure out how to create a custom curve, put it on the scope and vape it, all without reading the docs. But being less complex it will not provide any real time approximations either. For me, my device is configured and .sxc file saved, so most my config changes will be made directly on the device when needed and I won't be utilizing the SXI-Q software very often. It's a nice feature to play with if the Preset modes don't meet the needs of the builds, I've created 3 additional S1-S3 that I can select 2 are slightly more powerful than Powerful+ and the other is similar to Soft.

Personally I don't see the two apps being very similar. They have different purpose and features, one's required and the other is optional and each will appeal to different consumers.
 
Last edited:

Darkly spectr

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 9, 2014
468
285
37
Belgium
I honestly don't understand why people are so freaking out about the 200 watts. yihi has been producing "200 watts" chips for a while. it's nothing new.

in the end it's just going to be another 40 amps max input/out device most likely.

I just wonder why the hell they are going 0,0001 min resistance. That pretty much means that this thing won't sense a short....ever. plus unless they are doing some magic like evolv where the mod is able to output 50+ amps without draining 50+ amps out of the batteries then you are going to have some weak ... power.

have fun vaping that 0,01 coils at 16 watts with a 40 amps limit
 

inspects

Squonkamaniac
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 15, 2014
4,455
10,798
Arizona, Ecuador
After using the RX200 and Wismec DNA 200, the mods are much more stable than the typical thin - taller mods. Although I rarely go higher than 50 watts, the batteries last for a couple days.

The ergonomics of the mod are great for stability. Haven't tipped over either mods since their inception. The ol SX Mini has been sitting for weeks. I like the YiHi SX mods, however, have tipped it over a couple times breaking a glass tank.

Vaping approx 40-50 watts, the batteries last, both are nice mods. The RX is less than 40 bucks.

Additionally, like others stated, I wouldn't buy a mod with 200 watt claims and two 18650 batteries from any vendor. I'd bet they're trying to get the mod into fruition ASAP, (or) whatever it takes to sell.
 

Vlad1

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 8, 2014
1,444
1,459
Earth
I may be able to give you some insight now that I've played with the SXI-Q software a bit on the ML. Whether or not this crosses over to the Sx450 only time will tell.

To start the SXI-Q is not necessary at all on the ML unless you want to do a firmware update or create custom output curves where you'd use S1-S5 rather than the Preset modes of Powerful, Powerful+, Eco, Standard or Soft. Everything else can be configured directly on the device. In regard to the power output the approach of SXI-Q is not the same as Escribe where in Escribe you can set a static Preheat for a static period of time when in Temp limiting mode. SXI-Q you set variable output levels with the use of 21 data points over a 10 sec period for either Power or Temp Limiting mode up to 100W in the first second on the ML. Another point worth noting is while it's necessary to use Escribe to set a custom TCR for different wire types it's not necessary to use SXI-Q for the ML as it can be done on the device directly but optionally can be done through the software. Also while Escribe attempts to provide approximations of real time data, SXI-Q does not and is mainly a configuration tool for the settings for the vaping experience. There's no Battery analyzer, Watt Hour calculator, Mod Analyzer, Atty Analyzer, Device Monitor etc.. that one would use within SXI-Q to get the device up and vaping.

The interface itself could use some work. It could use some mouse over help tags, more copy and save fields, direct input fields rather than drag and drop, disabling selections like Ni200, TI when Power mode is selected and probably more I haven't come across with my limited use, but overall it's not terrible. Being it's mainly a tool for configuring output settings it's much less complex than Escribe so easier to get setup and vaping for the average consumer. It took me all of 10 min to figure out how to create a custom curve, put it on the scope and vape it, all without reading the docs. But being less complex it will not provide any real time approximations either. For me, my device is configured and .sxc file saved, so most my config changes will be made directly on the device when needed and I won't be utilizing the SXI-Q software very often. It's a nice feature to play with if the Preset modes don't meet the needs of the builds, I've created 3 additional S1-S3 that I can select 2 are slightly more powerful than Powerful+ and the other is similar to Soft.

Personally I don't see the two apps being very similar. They have different purpose and features, one's required and the other is optional and each will appeal to different consumers.

To add to this as I didn't really think of it until just recently since I rarely use power mode (and I'm slow sometimes). But assume one wanted to vape in Power mode with a fast ramp up but then cool down over the course of a long draw. Typical devices will just apply the set power and the coils will continue to rise in temp, but with a SXI-Q curve the ability exists to drop the applied power over the course of the draw in turn reducing or stabilizing the coil temperature as the image below depicts. Or alternatively start low and go higher for a cool ramp up with a punch of power at the end.

upload_2016-1-9_12-25-18.png
 

KenD

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 20, 2013
5,396
9,257
48
Stockholm, Sweden
kennetgranholm.com
Not sure what you mean here, the major chip makers already measure and take battery charge level into consideration and major mod makers including internal batteries use the correct batteries.
As there's no way to instantly measure a battery's capacity, it's up to the user to purchase batteries appropriate for their vaping level
Yes, but with 200w two-battery mods there are no appropriate batteries. That's my point.

Sent from my M7_PLUS using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread