It's surprising to Me how many people don't know the limitations of 18650's 
We as a community really need to change that!
We as a community really need to change that!
Looks kind of cool, but how about an 80W dual batt mod just for a change of pace Yihi?
It would be well within safety limits, and the battery life would be pretty good.
Just a thought.
As long as they fit in the mod then go for it! lol Kidding! But if you should decide to do it please upload a good photo of your face so we can compare before and after photos. ha ha
Or in any high wattage device....two 10 amp re-wrapped 18650 also fits in a soon to be released Q....
Exactly, so I think this debate and finger pointing to Yihi vs The DNA is pointless,
Cheap under rated battery for hi wattage is a safety concern, sufficient battery safety knowledge is a must no matter what's the moders/chip maker announce.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, but moders/chip manufacturers must learn to take their responsibility.Exactly..... As said: Cheap under rated battery for hi wattage is a safety concern, sufficient battery safety knowledge is a must no matter what's the moders/chip maker announce.
So the IPV5 also just got announced, which appears to be the Q-class's cheaper cousin using the SX330-200 chip:
IPV5 Box Mod 200w $50.34 | Vaping Cheap
So the IPV5 also just got announced, which appears to be the Q-class's cheaper cousin using the SX330-200 chip:
IPV5 Box Mod 200w $50.34 | Vaping Cheap
So far as evaluating whether the product can perform what it claims, we only need to concern ourself with a charged battery and how it performs. So far as when the battery is below maximum charge, we don't know anything about how the product performs. For example, it may limit the maximum current draw below a defined voltage, just as other chips do.
The previous sx350j board could be wired either in parallel or series configurations. Modder's choice. In parallel Yihi listed it at 92% efficiency, and in series up to 96% efficiency (under 75W).
Yes, but moders/chip manufacturers must learn to take their responsibility.
Sent from my M7_PLUS using Tapatalk
Probably a 200W preheat, followed by a lower setting. More than enough for any TC user. The real question from me is if the software is as meh as escribe. I don't want to use a USB-tethered 90s-style user interface to configure my mod.
I may be able to give you some insight now that I've played with the SXI-Q software a bit on the ML. Whether or not this crosses over to the Sx450 only time will tell.
To start the SXI-Q is not necessary at all on the ML unless you want to do a firmware update or create custom output curves where you'd use S1-S5 rather than the Preset modes of Powerful, Powerful+, Eco, Standard or Soft. Everything else can be configured directly on the device. In regard to the power output the approach of SXI-Q is not the same as Escribe where in Escribe you can set a static Preheat for a static period of time when in Temp limiting mode. SXI-Q you set variable output levels with the use of 21 data points over a 10 sec period for either Power or Temp Limiting mode up to 100W in the first second on the ML. Another point worth noting is while it's necessary to use Escribe to set a custom TCR for different wire types it's not necessary to use SXI-Q for the ML as it can be done on the device directly but optionally can be done through the software. Also while Escribe attempts to provide approximations of real time data, SXI-Q does not and is mainly a configuration tool for the settings for the vaping experience. There's no Battery analyzer, Watt Hour calculator, Mod Analyzer, Atty Analyzer, Device Monitor etc.. that one would use within SXI-Q to get the device up and vaping.
The interface itself could use some work. It could use some mouse over help tags, more copy and save fields, direct input fields rather than drag and drop, disabling selections like Ni200, TI when Power mode is selected and probably more I haven't come across with my limited use, but overall it's not terrible. Being it's mainly a tool for configuring output settings it's much less complex than Escribe so easier to get setup and vaping for the average consumer. It took me all of 10 min to figure out how to create a custom curve, put it on the scope and vape it, all without reading the docs. But being less complex it will not provide any real time approximations either. For me, my device is configured and .sxc file saved, so most my config changes will be made directly on the device when needed and I won't be utilizing the SXI-Q software very often. It's a nice feature to play with if the Preset modes don't meet the needs of the builds, I've created 3 additional S1-S3 that I can select 2 are slightly more powerful than Powerful+ and the other is similar to Soft.
Personally I don't see the two apps being very similar. They have different purpose and features, one's required and the other is optional and each will appeal to different consumers.
Yes, but with 200w two-battery mods there are no appropriate batteries. That's my point.Not sure what you mean here, the major chip makers already measure and take battery charge level into consideration and major mod makers including internal batteries use the correct batteries.
As there's no way to instantly measure a battery's capacity, it's up to the user to purchase batteries appropriate for their vaping level