For lower power, the 20700b is excellent, a true 4000 mAh.
Yep, I'm running the Sanyo 20700B right now in mine, I usually vape around 30w or lower. Battery capacity is ridiculous (true 4200mah I believe).For lower power, the 20700b is excellent, a true 4000 mAh.
u should try samsung 48G 4800 mah with 10a out put ....Yep, I'm running the Sanyo 20700B right now in mine, I usually vape around 30w or lower. Battery capacity is ridiculous (true 4200mah I believe).
It's almost not worth it to me to try to fit the 21700 (Samsung 40T) in it unless I were vaping higher wattages. I'm just going to stick with the 20700B for now. I'm getting a full day out of it without any problems.
The Sanyo 2070C will be available soon as well. 3500mah at up to 35A. That will be a nice cell for those of you wanting to run higher wattages with a 20700. Even though I run lower wattages (usually), I will most likely pick up a pair of the 2070C for my Pulse when available. Options are always good.
I'm running the 48G in my Desire Cut and LV Mirage. The only thing about the 48G is one of my chargers won't even make contact with the terminals to charge it. The negative is slightly recessed, but the positive terminal is as well. The positive end is what causes problems for me.u should try samsung 48G 4800 mah with 10a out put ....
Yeah, and I had just purchased a bunch of VTC5As. A month later, I'm now focused on 2x700's. I will probably keep one new pair and pass the others along rather than let them sit and age.Same here on excess 18650s. I'd picked up several sets when I had a pd270, immediately before changing to 20700 squonkers and the Oceanus. I'm keeping some, but PIFing a bunch.
I'm definitely looking forward to an update for locking +/- buttons. I got a warm vape, turned out to be 80W instead of 30 [emoji5] I must have been unconsciously fiddling with it while at an event.
That's not a real issue, 21700 aren't supposed to fit, it was designed for 18650 and 20700 only.Just found one tiny issue with vv 80w with 21700 battery.
Vandy Vape is rumored to be releasing the first firmware update sometime in June.I've had mine for a week now, also working great. TC with SS316L fires well but it's nowhere near the DNA75 in the JAC or even the Drag. I'm keeping it for a while hoping VV releases some firmware improving TC. If not, it's going out the door. I find myself not liking boxy mods after using the JAC for a while now.
not blaming VV 80w, just want to let others user know that tiny issue with 21700 (yes i know, it doesn't make for 21700 )That's not a real issue, 21700 aren't supposed to fit, it was designed for 18650 and 20700 only.
What exactly is the problem people are having in TC mode(s)?
Had my 80W now for a couple of weeks and I've found the TC performance to be very good. I did have to adjust the TCR for my SS316L build. I thought the 1100 default value was too high. A value between 0980 and 1060 is about right.
Good TC performance is a must for me, and this is better than good once the right TCR is dialed in. I only do SS so I can't vouch for whether the mod does Ni or Ti well, but my guess is that the same computations are performed regardless of which material you select.
That is, if you have two or three different types of TC wire, all you need to do is dial in a material's TCR and you're good. Have SS316L in one atty and SS340 in another? Put one in SS mode with its TCR and put another in Ni or Ti and dial in its TCR. SS, Ni and Ti are just labels.
What exactly is the problem people are having in TC mode(s)?
I'd rate the battery life a C. I don't know what the chip specifications are, but its efficiency can't be much more than 90%. I have single cell Eleafs with TC dialed in to near perfection and side-by-side the VV chip is not their equal. It's just my impression, but the VV chip doesn't sleep as well as the Joyetech chips, either. I also have Smoant (single cell) and Think Vape (dual) devices that sleep much better and are more efficient.I've been wondering this myself, but I don't do TC, so I'm not one to judge.
DJLSB gave TC poor comments, but his firmware version was 0.0.0.4. Other reviewers had 0.0.0.3.
The mod was released with 0.0.0.5. Perhaps there was a simple fundamental flaw in TC in 0.0.0.4 and earlier that was fixed prior to retail release with 0.0.0.5? Maybe a lot of this is just hearsay as well based on the review by DJLSB?
Sounds like several of you are getting at least satisfactory results by dialing in a better TCR. Maybe 0.0.0.5 fixed some of the issues DJLSB reported. Good possibility there will be additional changes in the next firmware, which should be available in the next few days.
I've also heard folks complaining of battery issues, and I just don't get it. I mean, it's still a single battery mod. If you aren't running a high capacity 20700, then yeah, it's going to eat a battery when you turn it up. I get VERY good battery life at 30w and under. I'm also using a 20700B, so I do have a true 4000mah battery in it. Supossedly there will be upcoming changes to address the battery 'issues', but short of lowering the cell cutoff (mine seems to cut out around 3.35v currently), we'll see if they do something else. Just makes we wonder of the battery complaints, are folks running a 2500mah 18650 at high wattages and just used to running duel battery mods?
Anyway, nice to hear several reports of good TC experiences. I think DJLSB said it was bad in 0.0.0.4, and all I've heard about it since was crap. Maybe some issues were already addressed and folks aren't giving it a fair shake, or arent reporting they are having good luck with it like you two are. I'd be interested to hear from others that are getting satisfactory TC results. Especially since it was mentioned to be better than the RSQ.