It might actually help save vaping for everyone, if lots of never-previously-smokers get interested in it. I think one of the things we have against us is how few we are, even if you count everyone who still smokes and those who've quit smoking since vaping came along.
Andria
There have been times when I have considered this, but it quickly fades away...
The people you refer to are not going to fight to keep vaping available and affordable.
The people you refer to are not going to care at all.
They'll just move on to other pursuits that interest them.
And we'll be left to what is left behind.
This isn't necessarily true. I think your argument is that people who don't
need to vape (i.e., vaping hobbyists who have never smoked cigarettes) are not going to join the fight if the government imposes overreaching and unnecessary regulations that cause vaping to no longer be available and affordable. All hobbies are voluntary, and no one
needs to participate (i.e., it's not life or death for them), but, if the government tried to severely limit a hobby (pick any hobby) or increase its costs to the point where it is impossible for enthusiasts to participate, those enthusiasts would certainly care, and there would be a group who would begin to fight back and attempt to convince their fellow enthusiasts to join their fight. With vaping, that's the point at which they'd find those who are fighting right now. For many, vaping has become a hobby, and I don't think enthusiasts are going to be happy to wake up one morning and find that it's been taken away from them.
I don't think we should write off the vaping enthusiasts who were not formerly smokers. The fact is, that results in nothing added to the fight. Even if all of the enthusiasts don't join the fight, it's better to do a little outreach (or, at least, not separate ourselves from them) and convince the ones who can be convinced. Greater numbers are better than fewer numbers.