I'm quite surprised at all the confusion surrounding this issue. Clearly Herbert A. Gilbert filed a patent for a non-combustion based alternative to smoking back in 1963. It clearly never caught on, which could have been for any number of reasons. I remember batteries sucking when I was a kid, let alone 20 years before that! I also don't think there would have been much call for a smoking alternative back in 1963. Hon Lik is clearly not the inventor of the concept of the e-cig, but every commercially available e-cig on the market today is based on his product vision. Apple didn't invent the concept of the GUI interface (neither did the Xerox PARC people) but they do deserve credit for bringing it to the masses, just as Hon Lik should. I think calling him the "father" of the e-cig is certainly justified. This happens all the time. In the future, who should get credit for all the ideas we know now, but to which we don't have access? Flying cars and FTL travel? The visionary who first thought it up or the people who actually put it in our hands?