Just seems unnecessarily risky to claim you know anything about a topic that is under-researched, and people will read your post, tell their friends, and begin a chain of misinformation. The only correct information is that authentic scientific research has not been done regarding long-term inhalation of food coloring. Please don't make claims otherwise.
Absolutely. Quite a bit of opinion masquerading as fact in this thread. I would add that long-term scientific research has not been done on any of the ingredients in e-liquid. There hasn't been time really. Is there a chance that twenty years from now, we might find that inhaling pg or vg or any of the number of chemicals in
food flavorings turns out to be harmful ? of course there's a chance, who knows.
We are all taking on some risk when vaping, but do it because we believe that the alternative is more risky. I for one, chose to eliminate as many variables that
might turn out to increase the risk, as i can, whilst still keeping vaping enjoyable enough for me to stick with.
For me this means, staying away from diketones as best i can, not sub-ohming, avoiding food coloring etc ... Others might have different criteria, or non at all, in what they will or won't vape. Fair enough, individual choice. I agree with you though, that it is irresponsible to state that vaping food coloring is harmless in the long term without adequate data. Heck, i'm not prepared to make that statement for pg or vg either.
Sorry if i derailed this thread more than it already is, but i really have no opinion as far as Mad Murdoch goes, nor which pg/vg/nic base is objectively of superior quality.