No. Making a less addictive cigarette is a good thing - IF (and that's the part the FDA is missing in the big picture) you offer safer alternatives to go to. Make the bad products less appealing, the good products more appealing, and you will have consumers switching in droves. Unfortunately - the PTB only focus on half the solution in their misguided quest. They need to disassociate nicotine from smoke - without the smoke, nicotine is on par with caffiene for chemical reactions in the body - and they need to offer us safer alternatives based on logic, not absolute 100% certainty.
Not just calories - once they push nationalized health care down our throats, this gives the govt the subtle authority to make all kinds of demands on our behavior...... from the specific foods and drinks you ingest to the amount of physical activity you do.
You want health care? You must not ingest any more that 1500 calories per day - no more than 20% from protien, 30% from this, blah, blah....and you must have 7 hours of physical activity per week - verified by a reciept from a gym or other "govenrment approved" activity facility. Are you in violation? Perhaps you should be shipped off to our new, state of the art, government approved "health spa" where you can help your country by building our infrastructure....
No, I don't have foreknowledge, and this is just my take on the subject, but anytime in the past you've accepted a specific perk from our government, it comes with multitudes of strings attached, and I predict that health care will be no different.