They are fudging the numbers.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
I'm a funeral director and have been in the death care field for 20 years. By my "seat of my pants" research, dealing with thousands of cases, smoking kills very few people at a young age, i.e. 40's, 50's, and 60's. The state of Maryland has had the question, "Did tobacco use contribute to the cause of death?" on our death certificates for about 15 years. I have only seen about five cases where the doctor checked yes. Even in cases where it would seem obvious, most doctors will check the "unknown" box. The fact is that it is very hard to tell if smoking causes certain diseases on an individual basis since many of us are predisposed, genetically, to certain diseases. I applaud these doctors for staying true to science and not caving to political pressure. It was due to doctors complaints that the "unknown" box was added. When the question was first put on death certificates the only choices were, yes, no, and maybe.

Exactly the point I was trying to make. Thank you for your educated observations.

The school of life and by being around certain fields for a long time, does make one educated. Not having a degree in something does not make one less smart.
 
Last edited:

Renolizzie

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 7, 2012
6,933
28,124
66
Northern Nevada, astride the "49er trail
The statistics are generally kind of skewed, IMHO. For instance, does any 80 or 90 year old on the planet really die from smoking? That is definitely living a long life. And if it was a better life due to smoking, do we have a right to hate on them?

I'm not saying that smoking is good for you but the hate and lies are really concerning to me. Anything that takes 50 or more years to kill most of its users isn't so bad that we need to hate on them. People aren't stealing cars and jewelry to support their "habit". People shouldn't be so judgmental. See those smokers, they don't deserve healthcare. Next it is fat people and then we move on to people that work in factories, people that didn't finish high school, etc. etc.

It really stuns me when I read about third hand smoke and how babies are being put at risk through third hand smoke. Ridiculous. "Don't let grandpa hold the baby. He smokes and even though we make him go outside and we don't even let the baby see second hand smoke, there are dangerous toxins clinging to him that will hurt the baby."
 

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
The statistics are generally kind of skewed, IMHO. For instance, does any 80 or 90 year old on the planet really die from smoking? That is definitely living a long life. And if it was a better life due to smoking, do we have a right to hate on them?

I'm not saying that smoking is good for you but the hate and lies are really concerning to me. Anything that takes 50 or more years to kill most of its users isn't so bad that we need to hate on them. People aren't stealing cars and jewelry to support their "habit". People shouldn't be so judgmental. See those smokers, they don't deserve healthcare. Next it is fat people and then we move on to people that work in factories, people that didn't finish high school, etc. etc.

It really stuns me when I read about third hand smoke and how babies are being put at risk through third hand smoke. Ridiculous. "Don't let grandpa hold the baby. He smokes and even though we make him go outside and we don't even let the baby see second hand smoke, there are dangerous toxins clinging to him that will hurt the baby."

I was confused by the third hand smoke statement that I have seen on the threads. I hadn't heard that one before. How utterly ridiculous! Lord the more I learn, the more I want to scream out of frustration!

My husband grew up in a family that never smoked. None of them.
I grew up in a family that all smoked. Mom even smoked while pregnant.
Hubby and all of his siblings have allergies of one kind or another.
Not one of my siblings, or I, have any allergies.

I know it's not scientific but just an observation. Another thing that confuses me, hubby got altitude sickness but the height never bothered me. I was still smoking at the time. We thought for sure it would be the opposite. I just attributed it to the fact my body was already used to not getting enough oxygen. ;)
 

EddardinWinter

The Philosopher Who Rides
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 13, 2012
8,866
28,169
Richmond, Va
<snip>

I know it's not scientific but just an observation. Another thing that confuses me, hubby got altitude sickness but the height never bothered me. I was still smoking at the time. We thought for sure it would be the opposite. I just attributed it to the fact my body was already used to not getting enough oxygen. ;)

I actually believe that is absolutely true. The resistance to CO (not CO2) in smoke makes your body deal with oxygen deprivation better. Not at all worth the health risks, but of some benefit. Sort of like being able to see the aliens in that King story...
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,618
1
84,741
So-Cal
The very ones. Nice!

I think they were actually "The Ten O'Clock People" for the time of the smoke break, though.

7 out of 9 times I understand the reference.

But only 5 out of 8 times I can site it from Memory without having to resort to Google.

Which is effective 9 out of 10 times for finding what I’m looking for on the 1st search.
 

EddardinWinter

The Philosopher Who Rides
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 13, 2012
8,866
28,169
Richmond, Va
7 out of 9 times I understand the reference.

But only 5 out of 8 times I can site it from Memory without having to resort to Google.

Which is effective 9 out of 10 times for finding what I’m looking for on the 1st search.

I see half of those references half as much as I should like, and the other half, I like less than half as much as they deserve!
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,618
1
84,741
So-Cal
The very ones. Nice!

I think they were actually "The Ten O'Clock People" for the time of the smoke break, though.

BTW – The generally excepted Margin for Error on Obscure Literary References is +/- 2 Hours. So Statistically I got it Right.

Maybe not on Jeopardy though. That, and I didn’t phrase my answer in the form of a Question.
 

Renolizzie

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 7, 2012
6,933
28,124
66
Northern Nevada, astride the "49er trail
I did not fellow the start of this post at all. Guess why. Not to be harsh I don't care. I'm lucky to still be alive. I love vaping. I would just like for the govt to leave me the heck alone along with the wonderful family I made on ecf. And all those vapers I have yet to meet.

Isn't that sweet.

Good to be alive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread