Fiberglass has a distinct odor when melting. If I had one, I would open it up and take a torch to it.
Since we pull the vapor into our lungs I think it is entirely possible to pull particulates with the vapor. Like sucking through a straw.I have a hard time wrapping my head around solids, in this case the speculated detritus from the ceramic/fiberglass/PFM filler material, making it's way to the lung.
I keep getting stuck at the idea, in my mind, "How do the solids travel in the vapor?".
To my way of limited reasoning if they were any little particles of the filler floatin' around they'd remain behind at the coil.
Can pieces of a given particulate large enough to be of concern actually go along for the ride in the vapor? I've no clue.
So the test report labels the wick or filler material as "fiberglass".
Is ceramic and fiberglass the same material?
I don't know where he got the information, but after researching "bio ceramic", it seems much more likely that this is what is being used.Aspire has confirmed on there site and sent out a public notice stating that there new "BVC" wicks are rigorously tested and has been approved and they have recognized the public concern about these. It uses a bio ceramic fill. Bio ceramic does not damage the lungs in any form and can be cleaned out easily even if you end up getting this "grit" in there.
I've heard nothing but rave reviews about the vertical coil, ceramic wicks. However, I saw the review that Rip Tripper did of the Mini Aspire Nautilus and the potential health concerns he had with the ceramic wicks. I haven't purchased the Mini Aspire so I don't have a personal opinion on it, but I believe some caution is in order until there is some type of data available on the safety issue. If Aspire was smart, they would have done some pre-manufacture tests on the vertical coils/ceramic wicks. How often does it seem that Chinese manufacturers release new gear without working out all of the bugs first? Pretty often in my experience.
I have not had any ill effects from my BVCs. I think that all of vaping is full of unknown risks. We are using things for purposes they were not originally intended for. And it has not been around long enough to know for sure. However, I still think that the risks are still better than 31 years of smoking.
Dr. Mearl F. Stanton of the National Cancer Institute between 1969 and 1977, showed that particles of fiberglass were carcinogenic to animals. Dr. Stanton’s study revealed that fiber glass fibers less than 3 micrometers in diameter and greater than 20 micrometers in length acted as carcinogens in rats, leading him to conclude that similar effects would probably be seen in humans.