thoughts on this article please

[StixNStones]

I think it's 100 percent bull.

 

[AttyPops]

The article by Dr Seigel that DC linked supposes the exact opposite and attributes formaldehyde to the PG ingredient. It is not entirely known at this point, according to Dr. Seigel, whom I have found to be a very reliable source in these matters. I have heard this supposition before. It is likely caused by excess heat applied to the liquid. in any case, it is found in minimal quantities.

Maybe I'm confusing formaldehyde with another chemical from VG. Don't remember. But I ended up avoiding excessive VG for whatever reason. So thanks for that info Lion. Guess I'll have to go do more research........

EDIT: Here's the post that changed my mind at the time:
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...91973-formaldehyde-e-vapor-2.html#post8946379 (post #12)

Regardless, that article the OP is discussing appears to be complete B.S.

 

[EddardinWinter]

It looks like there is still a debate as to which is responsible. The amounts found in vapor are 12-36 times lower than in smoking. Smoking levels are not considered toxic, so...

Not that I want any at all. Thanks for the info, Atty.

 

[awsum140]

I don't mind a little formaldehyde, as I age it'll keep me well pickled.

 

[Coastal Cowboy]

The next study to be published will explain that the surfaces of your e-cig hardware are contaminated with as much urine, feces and boogers as the keyboard on your laptop. And the one after that will warn of the cancer risk caused by the radiation released when holding an e-cig so close to your brain.

Environmental Working Group is on it like a duck on a Junie bug.

 

[Heavyrocker]

Propagana is Rampant.

 

[awsum140]

FDA = Federal Disinformation Agency, a branch office of the Politburough.