Topfeeder juicer mods VS Bottomfeeder juicer Mods

[unsure]

Well I tried and gave the expert forum a chance to answer but no luck so I hoping is OK with the moderators to post the question to the general public.....Anyway what are the pros & cons (I wont mention anyones model). Which in your opinion is the best approach to a better vaping device? Please answer without mentioning models cause I dont want to turn this into X brand name VS Y brand name.

I have one of each coming and I will be able to test them myself but there is a lot of knowedge out here and I like to hear your thoughts.

Thanks

 

[db2k]

IMO, top feeders are much better since they drop the juice into the atty just as the user would.

The bottom feeders that you have to "tilt" to get the juice into the atty seems a lot more...stupid?

Top feeders usually hold a bottle, bottom feeders have a juice reservoir. That adds to the bulk at the top of the device and also seems a bit clumsy.

(I assume that I am interpreting your top vs. bottom definition correctly.)

 

[unsure]

IMO, top feeders are much better since they drop the juice into the atty just as the user would.

The bottom feeders that you have to "tilt" to get the juice into the atty seems a lot more...stupid?

Top feeders usually hold a bottle, bottom feeders have a juice reservoir. That adds to the bulk at the top of the device and also seems a bit clumsy.

(I assume that I am interpreting your top vs. bottom definition correctly.)

Actually they both use a bottle (the 2 I ordered). Dang I promised I wouldnt name models but trust me they both use bottles you squeeze to juice the attys. One from the top and the other one is the "unnamed juice box"(sorry I had to specify).....I could be wrong about it being a bottomfeeder.
Heck with it the 2 are

unnamed juice box http://www.ecigmods.com/box-mods.html

Clear Yellow MP1 Stealth Edition w/no LED (510) http://www.shop.pufftronic.com/Clear-Yellow-MP1-Stealth-Edition-w-no-LED-510-MP1CMY.htm

 

[Quick1]

What in the world is wrong with naming products in a general forum? I can see where it might be in bad taste if you were having this discussion on one or the other mod's forum but not here.

 

[unsure]

What in the world is wrong with naming products in a general forum? I can see where it might be in bad taste if you were having this discussion on one or the other mod's forum but not here.

I didnt want a fanboy war started but I named them anyway in the last post and links so they can verify top and bottom auto feeders. Mr Puffer is for sure a top feeder and the unnamed I think is the bottom feeder.

 

[CloudBurst]

I have several tube feeders and finally made a mod with the bottom feeder...
I have always liked the tube feeders, you can see the juice go into the cart and you are basically refilling the cart with each pump. Very consistent flavorful vape after you get the hang of it. I went to smaller tube after awhile because I kept flooding the atty and leaking out the atty holes. No more leaking since I went smaller.
The bottom feeder, not so happy. It seemed like you had to pump with every puff, I even forced myself to use it exclusively for a few days to see if it was just the learning curve. I tore it apart and made it a tube feeder. I hate the taste of a dry atty! I would think a cart obviously holds more juice than the bottom of an atty.

I also ordered "IT" and hope it's better than the one I made. If not, I'm sure it's easly converted to tube feed. Time will tell...hope this helps!

 

[jcamacho]

I have 2 Carlos juice boxes and a Mr. Puffer, they both work great. I have also on order the unnamed, which I will compare to the other 3 when I receive. If size is a consideration the Mr. Puffer is smaller and can be taken anywhere.

 

[CloudBurst]

I have a few of the pencil sharpeners that are the body of the "IT" and they are huge! Bigger than the Carlos JB or anything I've ever vaped. I will sacrifice size for pleasure...LOL (that didn't come out right) you know what I mean!!

 

[unsure]

I have several tube feeders and finally made a mod with the bottom feeder...
I have always liked the tube feeders, you can see the juice go into the cart and you are basically refilling the cart with each pump. Very consistent flavorful vape after you get the hang of it. I went to smaller tube after awhile because I kept flooding the atty and leaking out the atty holes. No more leaking since I went smaller.
The bottom feeder, not so happy. It seemed like you had to pump with every puff, I even forced myself to use it exclusively for a few days to see if it was just the learning curve. I tore it apart and made it a tube feeder. I hate the taste of a dry atty! I would think a cart obviously holds more juice than the bottom of an atty.

I also ordered "IT" and hope it's better than the one I made. If not, I'm sure it's easly converted to tube feed. Time will tell...hope this helps!

No...it helps a lot!! Thank you. I appreciate hearing from someone whos experienced both types.

If not, I'm sure it's easly converted to tube feed

Yeah....we might need to talk!!

 

[BuzzKill]

Bottom feeders from what I have read ! will regurgitate the juice back into the bottle after it has been burnt some + they must use the atty that has a hole in the bottom .
so ?

 

[Israfil]

Honestly I'd go with the top feed for now, bottom just doesn't seem to be perfected as of yet...but in the future with piezoelectric pumps we may be able to bottomfeed a controlled amount in a spray when you're pushing the button. That would be the goal. Keep an eye out for it

 

[unsure]

Bottom feeders from what I have read ! will regurgitate the juice back into the bottle after it has been burnt some + they must use the atty that has a hole in the bottom .
so ?

hmmmm On the site for the "Un-Named JuiceBox" they come without Attys and no mention of special ones.
Box Mods - eCigMods - Marietta Georgia - e-Cigarette Modding Shop

 

[CloudBurst]

I think most of the attys have the hole in the bottom, it's the connectors on the battys that would be different, the sealed ones do not have the hole. Either way, your attys will work.

 

[misterD]

i made myself a bottom feeder and it works great. but i've heard that it suppose to use less juice than dripping or using carts but its uses way more maybe becos sometimes i pump too much and it leaks. juice tastes great on it though!! i see the top feeding just as being a regular dripping action... so i vote for the bottom feeding as being the best system. needs and can be perfected but its the way to go!!

 

[unsure]

Thanks for all your opinions...much appreciated. Eventually I'll have both "Mr. Puffer" and the "it" and I'll know which I think is best. Btw the winner I'll keep and the loser will almost new and be sold here in the classified section. Hmmmm wonder what its like to buy something and NOT wait for it to be built!

 

[richardf]

I made a top juice feed, and I love it. I attempted a bottom fed unit tonight. I fed the juice up the center battery connector. To get enough juice to the atty, it floods out the vent holes, and then is hard to draw with no way of venting. Attempting to use standard 510 attys, is this where I am messing up?