• This forum has been archived

    If you'd like to post a thread, post it here instead!

    View Forum

toronto wants to ban vaping..

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ryedan

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2012
12,869
19,652
Ontario, Canada
I hear ya aggo. I don't think big clouds are a factor, but even if they are I don't want to give an inch and lose a foot or a yard. They're claiming unknown health issues, that it looks like smoking, save the children, basically all the typical crap that doesn't make any sense to me. I don't think we have anything to lose by trying to curb that.
 

Ryedan

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 31, 2012
12,869
19,652
Ontario, Canada
Citynews also did a 2 min vid - Board of Health to consider restricting e-cigarette use | CityNews

She kept saying "might" & "could" - either you have proof & want action or go home - I think she's been smoking Ford's pipe.

Whoever put this individual in charge, should start wondering why.

There's a poll at that site, "Should e-cigarettes be banned wherever smoking is not allowed?", that we're losing 66% to 34%. It's just a quick couple of clicks to vote :)
 

Gqballa

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 17, 2013
76
24
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This is not a ban of ecigs, this is simply not allowing ecigs in places where cigarettes are currently prohibited.
Flame me all you want, I agree with it. I don't care if the output of an ecig is not harmful, the odours can affect people in a number of ways, be it scent allergies, dehydration (it does happen), or rekindling the urges of someone who quit smoking.
vaping in a restaurant us ridiculous, and the same goes for IN work places or schools. Believe me, I've vaped in most places, only after permission from owners/managers and whomever is with me, and I do not "chase clouds" inside of any buildings other than my own. We must be respectful of public spaces; if someone is blowing massive clouds in a restaurant, they're drawing attention to themselves in a negative and obnoxious way.
Now, if an establishment was allowed to declare themselves as "vape friendly" all the power to them, and if others throw up "no vaping" signs, the same goes for them.
I do disagree with an all out ban, and I do agree with regulations, to a point. Like any consumer products, e liquid needs to have standards as far as the "production area" is concerned, as well as quality of ingredients. As it stands any jerk can produce their own liquid in an alley and sell it online as "canadian made natural ingredients." With operations like that (ok, maybe not in an alley) all it does is add fuel to the all out ban fire. Legitimacy is the only way to approach this market, whether for brand popularity or a dedication to safety or quality.
An all out ban would be foolish, as I'm sure the number of tobacco related deaths will decrease as vaping increases. And that's a good thing.
Our commitment to keeping ecig products on the market is key, this community and every community like it does have a voice, and if we are heard in the appropriate way, this "Wild West" ecig market may continue. All it takes is a few mistakes for this to end for all of us.
The end.

Took the words right out of my mouth
or head
 

retired1

Administrator
Admin
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 5, 2013
51,346
46,139
Texas
This is not a ban of ecigs, this is simply not allowing ecigs in places where cigarettes are currently prohibited.
Flame me all you want, I agree with it. I don't care if the output of an ecig is not harmful, the odours can affect people in a number of ways, be it scent allergies, dehydration (it does happen), or rekindling the urges of someone who quit smoking.
Vaping in a restaurant us ridiculous, and the same goes for IN work places or schools. Believe me, I've vaped in most places, only after permission from owners/managers and whomever is with me, and I do not "chase clouds" inside of any buildings other than my own. We must be respectful of public spaces; if someone is blowing massive clouds in a restaurant, they're drawing attention to themselves in a negative and obnoxious way.
Now, if an establishment was allowed to declare themselves as "vape friendly" all the power to them, and if others throw up "no vaping" signs, the same goes for them.
I do disagree with an all out ban, and I do agree with regulations, to a point. Like any consumer products, e liquid needs to have standards as far as the "production area" is concerned, as well as quality of ingredients. As it stands any jerk can produce their own liquid in an alley and sell it online as "canadian made natural ingredients." With operations like that (ok, maybe not in an alley) all it does is add fuel to the all out ban fire. Legitimacy is the only way to approach this market, whether for brand popularity or a dedication to safety or quality.
An all out ban would be foolish, as I'm sure the number of tobacco related deaths will decrease as vaping increases. And that's a good thing.
Our commitment to keeping ecig products on the market is key, this community and every community like it does have a voice, and if we are heard in the appropriate way, this "Wild West" ecig market may continue. All it takes is a few mistakes for this to end for all of us.
The end.

It always starts off small. First one community restricts it, then another outright bans it. Next thing you know, the federal government is looking at it, sees all the communities that have already restricted/banned vaping and what do you think the Feds are going to do?

Complacency when it comes to legislative matters is never a good thing. The stigma that Health Canada has put on the industry as a whole is not a good thing. And guess who the various councils and legislative bodies are going to take their cue from? It sure isn't going to be JQ Public. It's up to every single vaper to fight legislation based on junk science and fear mongering.
 

teabagger

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 31, 2010
564
126
newmarket
I believe subjecting other people to my pseudo-natural bodily functions(and some natural bodily functions) should not have to be controlled by the government, but by empathy and understanding. That being said, I was stuck in line behind someone last night that took 23 items to the 1 -16 item cashier, and plonked them on the belt!

avent-garde

kind regards.
 

Bobbilly

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 27, 2014
327
423
Canada
I believe subjecting other people to my pseudo-natural bodily functions(and some natural bodily functions) should not have to be controlled by the government, but by empathy and understanding. That being said, I was stuck in line behind someone last night that took 23 items to the 1 -16 item cashier, and plonked them on the belt!

avent-garde

kind regards.

Now that needs regulation.
 

compile

Moved On
Aug 10, 2014
48
38
Canada
The 1st minute of the interview from CTV made me stop watching. She stated that propylene glycol CAN turn into formeldahyde from an ecig. Its funny because formeldahyde is used to preserve and PG is used to retain water essentially. This all sounds like big tobacco paying people off so ecigs become more expensive then regular analogs thus forcing uneducated people to stick to what they have. It's funny how she also states that there is enough evidence from a short research trial but says that ecigs aren't tested enough. Holy contradicting herself.

I literally just came back from my doc who's head of residency at SouthLake Hospital and this is what he said.
"There are about 5 different studies going on right now and they are all over the map. If someone asked me what is better (ecig vs analog), I'd say neither (he laughed), but honestly an ecig would be my choice as there aren't even 1/8 of the amount of chemicals in a bottle of fluid compared to 1 cigarette. My only concern is that people may get addicted to vaping (mentally). Other than that, I say good for you for switching from cigarettes to ecigs. Just keep reducing the amount of nicotine."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread