The costs of running this huge site are paid for by ads. Please consider registering and becoming a Supporting Member for an ad-free experience. Thanks, ECF team.

U.S.A: PACT Act 2009

Discussion in 'Law and the E-Cigarette' started by AngeLsLuv, Sep 11, 2009.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Image has been removed.
URL has been removed.
Email address has been removed.
Media has been removed.
  1. Outlander

    Outlander Unregistered Supplier ECF Veteran

    Oct 22, 2009
    Westminster, CO USA
    Well they actually have that covered also in the "Delivery Sale" clause and definition, meaning any sale in which the seller is not face to face with the buyer.

    ‘(5) DELIVERY SALE- The term ‘delivery sale’ means any sale of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco to a consumer if--


    ‘(A) the consumer submits the order for the sale by means of a telephone or other method of voice transmission, the mails, or the Internet or other online service, or the seller is otherwise not in the physical presence of the buyer when the request for purchase or order is made; or
    ‘(B) the cigarettes or smokeless tobacco are delivered to the buyer by common carrier, private delivery service, or other method of remote delivery, or the seller is not in the physical presence of the buyer when the buyer obtains possession of the cigarettes or smokeless tobacco.


    But from what I can tell, they are still only referring to cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products in the original terms which do not atm include the e-cigs and e-juices.

    (1) the term “cigarette” means—
    (A) any roll of tobacco wrapped in paper or in any substance not containing tobacco; and
    (B) any roll of tobacco wrapped in any substance containing tobacco which, because of its appearance, the type of tobacco used in the filler, or its packaging and labeling, is likely to be offered to, or purchased by, consumers as a cigarette described in subparagraph (A);

    (6) the term “smokeless tobacco” means any finely cut, ground, powdered, or leaf tobacco that is intended to be placed in the oral or nasal cavity or otherwise consumed without being combusted;
     
  2. Outlander

    Outlander Unregistered Supplier ECF Veteran

    Oct 22, 2009
    Westminster, CO USA
    Bob,

    I know it is an old post, buy I have to take the other view in this. Up and until the point when something becomes unlawful, it is legal. Being legal, we therefore have the right to partake. Saying that we don't have the right to vape because there is no legislation giving us that right by legalizing its use, is like saying we don't have a right to eat.

    We do not need to Legalize or license the act of Vaping, the PV or the pure e-juices (0 nic). The only thing that should be allowed to be regulated would be the nic or juices containing nic.

    What we need to do is prevent the regulation and subjugation of all e-products excepting those that contain a tobacco or derivative.
     
  3. Dredbull

    Dredbull Ultra Member ECF Veteran

    Grab your ankles laddies and lasses!!

    Looks like presachump signed it.. I sure hope it is a freaking april fools joke.
     
  4. NuGalicia

    NuGalicia Senior Member ECF Veteran

    Jun 7, 2010
    Tulalip WA
    Early in the thread someone asked what's the strongest you could get. I found 99% pure on a chinese site called jgherb.
     
  5. davidzx

    davidzx Senior Member ECF Veteran

    Jun 5, 2010
    New Jersey, USA
    A ruling for the PACT Act is pending, and many politicians see their good standing compromised if they don't consent to this initiative. Once it is passed, the passage of time is their plentiful harvest in reaping of the rewards of their most valued initiative. Irrespectively, beneath fast growing tall grass is indicative of the manure beneath it. The passage of the politicians abundant season of disregard for the factual data and truth will be embraced with an inevitable season of accountability. In wake of all beliefs, opinions, and agendas:

    WE THE PEOPLE embrace other innovative approaches beyond those already tried offering promising solutions to alleviate tobacco harm

    WE THE PEOPLE condemn all illicit works to foster tobacco harm fatalities in such manner.

    WE THE PEOPLE heave in wake of any initiative to limit the options we have to quit smoking.

    WE THE PEOPLE

    PETITION EXCLUSIVE ATTENTION ABOVE POLITICAL GOOD STANDING, IN WAKE OF ALL ODDS, FOR THE BENEFIT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, FOR THE SAKE OF UPHOLDING THE VIRTUES OF ETHICALITY, IN THE INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE YOU REPRESENT, AND SO THAT MISTAKEN LEGISLATIVE AGENDAS DO NOT TRANSPIRE IN CONTRA TO THE TRUTH - AND OUR ACCOUNTABILITY IS LESSENED THEREOF.

    Sorry I got way to political there, but I'll give up before my fingers snap at the keyboard. Hope you guys like the cognizant argument, maybe a template for a petition. All in all, someone please remove these airhead savage animals from executive offices. They're a liability to my health and public welfare in general. If someone doesn't realize this and eradicate brainless fools from the offices they don't have the intelligence to deserve - then what direction is our country headed in? Well so far its near a depression - someone wake up and do something.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice