UCLA campus to become tobacco-free zone

Status
Not open for further replies.

xhuffer

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 21, 2011
142
173
SoCal
LOS ANGELES - The UCLA campus will become a smoke- and tobacco- free zone beginning in April, Chancellor Gene Block announced today, following through on a request by the president of the University of California system.
The policy will take effect on Earth Day, April 22, Block said. It will ban the use of all tobacco products, along with electronic cigarettes, on the UCLA campus and at any sites owned or leased by the university.
"Tobacco use and exposure to second-hand smoke remain the leading causes of preventable disease and death worldwide," Block wrote in a letter to the UCLA community. "A draft of the tobacco-free policy will be available for review by students, faculty and staff beginning Nov. 15. We also plan to ensure that tobacco users in our community have access to a variety of free and low- cost support services, in addition to those provided by health insurance, to help them."
According to UCLA, the university is the first in the UC system to announce plans to ban tobacco products, although more than 800 colleges across the country have enacted similar policies.
UC President Mark Yudof previously requested that all campuses in the system adopt a tobacco-free policy. UCLA created a Tobacco-Free Steering Committee, which recommended the policy to Block and will develop an implementation plan, according to the university. Linda Sarna, a UCLA nursing professor and chair of the campus' Academic Senate, said tobacco bans on other university campuses have led to an increase in the number of people who quit smoking.

"The world is changing," she said. "People didn't used to wear seatbelts or bike helmets, and they used to smoke in airplanes and restaurants. But we know more than we did in the 1950s and we have to act. We have a responsibility to the health of our campus, and this is the right thing to do." She said the university will work with the county Department of Public Health to offer free two-week starter kits for smokers who want to quit.

Let's have a vape in & try to get arrested or cited so the no vape part gets rescinded.
 

mwplefty

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 28, 2012
185
56
32
Chicago, IL
"The world is changing," she said. "People didn't used to wear seatbelts or bike helmets, and they used to smoke in airplanes and restaurants. But we know more than we did in the 1950s and we have to act."

More like the mid- to late-1990's. Smoking was banned in restaurants in California in January 1995. And smoking was banned on all U.S. flights in April 1998. Also, most of the people I know, adults AND kids, never wear and never have worn bike helmets. I'm one of the few people who does. Seatbelt laws have also been arounds since the mid-1980's. Once again, paranoid progressive crap.
 

Petrodus

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2010
7,702
8,132
Midwest
The primary reason for many e-smoking bans
has Absolutely NOTHING to do with Health concerns.

Avoid confusion between e-cigarettes and tobacco smoking,
by providing a consistent message that smoking or "perceived smoking" is unacceptable.

It's just easier to ban e-smoking than deal with
those who are "easily offended"

Heard on the news the other day ...
Someone complained to a college that they were offended
by the use of the term "Freshmen" ...
So the college changed the term to "First Year Students"
:ohmy:
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
UCLA Chancellor gets an F for announcing unwarranted and unenforcable campus wide ban on all tobacco use, falsely claiming that smoking "includes the use of smokeless tobacco products and the use of unregulated nicotine products (e.g. e-cigarettes)", and downplaying future noncompliance by claiming "enforcement should be primarily educational".
No smoking allowed: UCLA to go tobacco-free in April / UCLA Newsroom

The real problems with these comprehensive tobacco use bans (i.e. rampant noncompliance) have been downplayed and denied by every school and hospital that has adopted these policies. When most of these bans are announced, it is even stated (for public relations purposes) that there won't be strict (if any) enforcement, and that they will rely upon educating and providing smoking cessation programs and subsidized NRT to tobacco users.

The problem is that most policies (especially those that are unwarranted and that violate privacy rights of constitutional rights against unreasonable searches and seizures) can only be effective if they are strictly enforced.

I anticipate that the same tobacco prohibitionists who urged universities and hospitals to implement these tobacco usage bans will begint demanding strict enforcement of the bans after a year or two (during which there is little or no compliance with the policies).

That is when the problems will really begin to be exposed, as the only real recourse a university has against a students, faculty and staff (for violating the policy) is to expell students from school, and to penalize/fire faculty and staff from their jobs.

That's when the school and hospital administrators will realize that the policy they adopted was unwarranted, unenforcable and
ineffective.
 

StereoDreamer

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 13, 2012
1,341
2,629
59
Columbia MD
She said the university will work with the county Department of Public Health to offer free two-week starter kits for smokers who want to quit.


I'm curious to know what these "free two-week starter kits" are? Are they a two-week prescription for Chantix? Nicorette gum? The Patch? Please, someone find out what these "kits" are and let the world know!
 

Tezcatlipoca

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 12, 2012
2,326
5,368
Riverside, CA
I'm curious to know what these "free two-week starter kits" are? Are they a two-week prescription for Chantix? Nicorette gum? The Patch? Please, someone find out what these "kits" are and let the world know!

My guess is it's a handful of pamphlets and a pack of Wrigley's chewing gum.
 

Petrodus

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2010
7,702
8,132
Midwest
I anticipate that the same tobacco prohibitionists who urged universities and hospitals to implement these tobacco usage bans will begin demanding strict enforcement of the bans after a year or two (during which there is little or no compliance with the policies).

That is when the problems will really begin to be exposed, as the only real recourse a university has against a students, faculty and staff (for violating the policy) is to expel students from school, and to penalize/fire faculty and staff from their jobs.

That's when the school and hospital administrators will realize that the policy they adopted was unwarranted, unenforceable and ineffective.
How very true ...
There's an article (which may have been previously posted?) ...
discussing the "enforcement" issue at Arizona State University.

ASU campuses going smoke-free next year

“I think our approach is going to be to enforce this with a very light touch
as opposed to a heavy hand ...”

In other words ... It ain't going to fly !!
1-BigGrin.png
 

NorthOfAtlanta

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 27, 2011
1,616
3,582
Canton, GA
How very true ...
There's an article (which may have been previously posted?) ...
discussing the "enforcement" issue at Arizona State University.

ASU campuses going smoke-free next year

“I think our approach is going to be to enforce this with a very light touch
as opposed to a heavy hand ...”

In other words ... It ain't going to fly !!
1-BigGrin.png

Did notice this ("The university plans to remove ashtrays from campus and post signs reminding people that campuses are tobacco-free once the ban goes into effect. Electronic cigarettes will still be permitted.") in the article. Wonder how long it will take the ANTZ heads to splode over it.

:evil::evil::evil::D:vapor::vapor:
 
Last edited:

Petrodus

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2010
7,702
8,132
Midwest
The time I have came in contact w/ a super zealot, I told him its eggplant nicotine. He said only tobacco has nicotine. I google it and show him health foods that contain it... He got all frustrated at being wrong and left me alone.
Zealots couldn't care less about the Truth ...
Only their agendas.

That applies to our elected officials including the "Regulator in Chief"
 

JENerationX

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 25, 2011
2,227
3,114
Rochester, NY
The time I have came in contact w/ a super zealot, I told him its eggplant nicotine. He said only tobacco has nicotine. I google it and show him health foods that contain it... He got all frustrated at being wrong and left me alone.

I had a persnickety bi.. ummm female dog of the non sporting variety at my former place of employment tell me "it's not better than smoking, you're still using nicotine". I said "so are you sweetheart, there's tomatoes in that salad." :evil: Good times when they get all holier than though about nicotine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread