Update: Westminter BOH gives up on tobacco ban

Status
Not open for further replies.

SueandCootie

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 31, 2009
569
835
south central Mass
It's interesting here that the woman in charge STILL voted in favor of banning all tobacco and related products (ecigs also)...town rules prevented her from being 'recalled' from her position, but the other two members could be removed from the board, and townspeople were working on making that happen. Those two voted against it.

Westminster ends bid to ban tobacco sales after outcry - 7News Boston WHDH-TV

For folks who haven't been following the story, here's what the locals thought of the proposed ban:

Hearing on tobacco ban ends on sour note - Worcester Telegram & Gazette - telegram.com

Westminster selectmen get an earful on proposed tobacco sales ban - Worcester Telegram & Gazette - telegram.com
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
It's not so much that they "listened to the people" as much as it was that the people refused to be ignored.
And they clearly didn't like that, as it upsets their modus operandi.

Or they were ignored :) In my experience, that is the one thing that infuriates any 'authority'. We had a local case where a car was pulled over on suspicion of being stolen. The cop (state trooper) frisked the guy, handcuffed him put him in the back of the cruiser. The guy said it was his brother's car and a simple phone call would clear it up. They stopped at a phone booth (this was a while ago) and the guy took off across the field running and the officer shot him in the back - dead. He basically 'ignored' the cops authority and p.... him off. No action was taken (both were white, btw) because the rule on shooting someone who was unarmed and not creating a 'clear and present danger' memo had not reached the local station from Columbus, Oh. ... sent a day or two before. (something one would have thought would have been policy already but it wasn't).
 

Nate760

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 11, 2014
1,301
4,541
San Marcos, CA, USA
They stopped at a phone booth (this was a while ago) and the guy took off across the field running and the officer shot him in the back - dead.

Call me a bleeding heart, but summary execution without due process of law seems a rather inordinately stiff penalty for suspicion of auto theft and/or evading arrest.
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
Call me a bleeding heart, but summary execution without due process of law seems a rather inordinately stiff penalty for suspicion of auto theft and/or evading arrest.

One doesn't need to be a bleeding heart to see this :D It's been so long ago, but it welded the 'what authority hates the most' bit into the brain for me. There are other 'incidents' that occurred since then - one with which I was personally involved - made a comment about the sheriff's department at a county meeting and got a few words from the sheriff - smiling but holding my coat lapels, as a 'joke' (which I didn't think was that funny and where I removed his hands.... smiling also :)... I think it was a applause I got that made him mad.... ...and a few others that only solidified the conclusions/observations. The community was outraged by the shooting, and the bit on the 'rule' not making it to the station, didn't help much :facepalm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread