I like short videos too, if I am going to watch a review vid I check to see how long it is. If it's close to 10 minutes I skip it. 5 minutes is about max, shorter if it's just one juice or piece of equipment.
Thank you for your very thought out reply. I appreciate it and grinned a few times and didn't "hear" any defensiveness. Well done. You've won me over. I'm gonna subscribe
2) Thanks for giving my stuff a shot! It was a good question to ask. I'm actually going to write a column about it and refer to you.
And now I'm going to get really nerdy on you (and everyone else).
In addition to the equipment, nicotine, PG/VG, etc., I mentioned, there are some technical reasons as to why I believe vaping on camera isn't all that informative.
1) Compression -- If a video is shot on a webcam (like a lot of YouTube reviews are), it's really compressed and a lot of detail is lost. I shoot my stuff at 720p with a fairly good consumer-level camera, so there's much less compression than a webcam. Even still, a ton of detail is lost when YouTube converts the videos. So what I saw during shooting and what a viewer see when watching are really different.
2) Lighting -- This is the biggie here. Unless e-liquid reviews are shot in a studio under the same lighting conditions, the exhale can look very different. Again, a lot of people record on webcams in their home or home office. If there's a window nearby, the lighting will change; exhaled vape recorded at 1PM will look different than exhaled vape recorded at 11PM. So recording it and saying it's indicative of anything could be misleading. The position of the sun, clouds, the number of lights on in the room, etc. will alter the appearance of vape exhale on camera.
Right now, I'm using two locations to shoot -- one indoor and one outdoor. The lighting conditions are so different that I can vape the same e-liquid on camera and make the exhale look different by using the outdoor location or four different parts of the indoor location. Since I try to switch up spots for variety, vaping on camera is potentially misleading (and I'd look silly).
Lighting is such a big deal when it comes to recording. The boss at Yahoo! Studios told me that he would rather shoot with a VHS camera and a light kit than a top-of-the-line HD camera and no light kit. The effects of lighting can be dramatic. I can make 100% PG juice seem as cloudy as 100% VG with the right lights. I don't think this is something most e-liquid video reviewers think about.
[And yes, I realize these are things that few people think or care about, but I'm using this post as a dry run for my column.]
Also
[Thanks for the bump levisdaddy!]